Medicolegal. What should a doctor tell?
出版信息
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Mar 9;290(6470):780-1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Medicolegal. What should a doctor tell?法医学。医生应该告知什么？
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Mar 9;290(6470):780-1.
2
The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal.外科医生告知风险的义务：上诉法院驳回跨大西洋的处理方式
Lancet. 1984 Mar 10;1(8376):578-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90989-9.
3
Consent to treatment: the medical standard reaffirmed.治疗同意书：重申医学标准。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 10;288(6419):802-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6419.802.
4
Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective.知情同意：从英国视角看一个加拿大案例。
Lancet. 1987 Oct 31;2(8566):1038. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92614-6.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
What should a doctor tell?医生应该告知什么？
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Aug 4;289(6440):325-6.
7
Doctor's duty to inform patient of substantial or special risks when offering treatment.医生在提供治疗时向患者告知重大或特殊风险的义务。
Lancet. 1985 Mar 2;1(8427):528-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92134-8.
8
Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).为何英国法院拒绝接受美国的知情同意原则（以及英国医生对此应如何应对）。
Am J Public Health. 1984 Nov;74(11):1286-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.11.1286.
9
Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital.西达韦诉贝特勒姆皇家医院案
All Engl Law Rep. 1984 Feb 23;[1984] 1:1018-36.
10
Why Britain can't afford informed consent.为何英国承担不起知情同意的代价。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1985 Aug;15(4):19-25.
本文引用的文献
1
Little shocks.
Practitioner. 1981 Nov;225(1361):1679-83.
Zotero 插件