• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸引力方程式:通过计算神经美学整合多维因素。

Equation for Attractiveness: Integrating Multidimensional Factors Through Computational Neuroaesthetics.

作者信息

Rahman Eqram, Esfahlani Shabnam Sadeghi, Rao Parinitha, Webb William Richard

机构信息

Research and Innovation Hub, Innovation Aesthetics, London, WC2H 9JQ, UK.

Medical Technology Research Centre (MTRC), School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Feb;49(3):841-861. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04304-7. Epub 2024 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04304-7
PMID:39187593
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding the multifaceted nature of attractiveness (A), which encompasses physical beauty (PB), genuineness (GEN), self-confidence (SC), and prior experience (RE), is crucial for various domains, including psychology and clinical aesthetics. Previous studies have often isolated specific elements, failing to capture their intricate interplay. This study aims to develop a comprehensive equation for attractiveness using computational neuroaesthetics.

METHOD

The study began with a pilot study involving 250 participants (50 experts and 200 laypersons) who prerated 500 facial images on a Likert scale for traits such as physical beauty, genuineness, self-confidence, and perceived prior experience. Following the pilot, the main study recruited 11,780 participants through diverse media channels to rate a new set of 1,000 facial images. Advanced computational techniques, including multiple linear regression and Bayesian hierarchical modelling, were employed to analyse the data and formulate an attractiveness equation.

RESULTS

The analysis identified genuineness as the most significant factor, followed by physical beauty, self-confidence, and prior experience. The proposed equation for attractiveness, refined through Bayesian modelling, is: (β is the intercept; β, β, β, β are the coefficients for each factor; and ϵ is the error term) CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the paramount importance of psychological traits in attractiveness assessments, suggesting a shift from purely physical enhancements to holistic interventions in clinical settings. This model provides a robust framework for understanding attractiveness and has potential applications in psychology, marketing, and AI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

理解吸引力(A)的多面性至关重要,它涵盖了外在美(PB)、真诚(GEN)、自信(SC)和过往经历(RE)等方面,这对包括心理学和临床美学在内的各个领域都很关键。以往的研究常常孤立地看待特定元素,未能捕捉到它们之间复杂的相互作用。本研究旨在运用计算神经美学开发一个全面的吸引力方程。

方法

该研究首先进行了一项试点研究,涉及250名参与者(50名专家和200名普通人),他们根据李克特量表对500张面部图像的外在美、真诚度、自信程度和感知到的过往经历等特质进行了预评分。试点研究之后,主要研究通过多种媒体渠道招募了11,780名参与者,让他们对一组新的1000张面部图像进行评分。采用了包括多元线性回归和贝叶斯层次建模在内的先进计算技术来分析数据并制定吸引力方程。

结果

分析确定真诚是最重要的因素,其次是外在美、自信和过往经历。通过贝叶斯建模优化后的吸引力方程为:(β为截距;β、β、β、β为各因素的系数;ϵ为误差项)结论:研究结果强调了心理特质在吸引力评估中的至关重要性,表明在临床环境中应从单纯的身体改善转向整体干预。该模型为理解吸引力提供了一个强大的框架,在心理学、市场营销和人工智能领域具有潜在应用价值。

证据水平IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。

相似文献

1
Equation for Attractiveness: Integrating Multidimensional Factors Through Computational Neuroaesthetics.吸引力方程式:通过计算神经美学整合多维因素。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Feb;49(3):841-861. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04304-7. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
2
Truth Lies in the Depths: Novel Insights into Facial Aesthetic Measurements from a U.S. Survey Panel.真相深藏:美国调查小组对面部美学测量的新见解。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(19):3711-3717. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04022-0. Epub 2024 May 21.
3
There Is no Universal Standard of Beauty.不存在普遍适用的美的标准。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Dec;48(24):5273-5282. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04266-w. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.八种女性汉族面型的形态学定量标准和美学评价。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0081-9. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
5
Consensus on Changing Trends, Attitudes, and Concepts of Asian Beauty.关于亚洲美容的变化趋势、态度和观念的共识。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Apr;40(2):193-201. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0562-0. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
6
The Ideal Chinese Lip: Impact of Lip Contours and Proportions.理想的中国唇:唇轮廓和比例的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Nov;48(21):4229-4238. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04183-y. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Perception of Age, Attractiveness, and Tiredness After Isolated and Combined Facial Subunit Aging.孤立和联合面部亚单位老化后的年龄、吸引力和疲劳感认知
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Dec;39(6):856-69. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0553-1. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
8
Ideals of Facial Beauty Amongst the Chinese Population: Results from a Large National Survey.中国人群对面部美的理想标准:一项大型全国性调查的结果
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1540-1550. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1188-9. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
The impact of education on the perception of facial profile aesthetics and treatment need.教育对面部轮廓美学认知及治疗需求的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Aug;38(4):620-31. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0329-z. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
10
Consensus on Changing Trends, Attitudes, and Concepts of Asian Beauty.亚洲之美:审美潮流、观念、态度的转变。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Aug;44(4):1186-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01808-w. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Beauty is only skin deep: An examination of physical attractiveness, attractive personality, and personal grooming on criminal justice outcomes.美丽只是表面的:对身体吸引力、有魅力的个性和个人修饰对刑事司法结果的考察。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 11;18(10):e0291922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291922. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychology of aesthetics: Beauty, social media, and body dysmorphic disorder.美学心理学:美、社交媒体与身体变形障碍
Clin Dermatol. 2023 Jan-Feb;41(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
3
Bayesian modeling of human-AI complementarity.
贝叶斯模型的人机互补。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 15;119(11):e2111547119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111547119. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
4
A precise quantification of how prior experience informs current behavior.对先前经验如何影响当前行为的精确量化。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Aug;151(8):1854-1865. doi: 10.1037/xge0001119. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
The Influence of Facial Asymmetry on Genuineness Judgment.面部不对称对真实性判断的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 25;12:727446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727446. eCollection 2021.
6
Neural responses to facial attractiveness in the judgments of moral goodness and moral beauty.对道德美和道德善的判断中对面部吸引力的神经反应。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Apr;227(3):843-863. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02422-5. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
7
Individuality: The New Beauty.个性:新的美。
Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Mar 15;42(4):444-446. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab365.
8
Personality Psychology.人格心理学。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;73:489-516. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114927. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
9
Machine learning performance validation and training using a 'perfect' expert system.使用“完美”专家系统进行机器学习性能验证和训练。
MethodsX. 2021 Aug 2;8:101477. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101477. eCollection 2021.
10
(Neuro)Aesthetics: Beauty, ugliness, and ethics.(神经)美学:美、丑与伦理。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):619-627. doi: 10.1002/pchj.478. Epub 2021 Aug 19.