Suppr超能文献

中年及老年期应对策略的纵向变化:来自美国中年研究的结果

Longitudinal changes in coping strategies across midlife and older adulthood: findings from the midlife in the United States study.

作者信息

Kurth Maria L, Witzel Dakota D, Cerino Eric S, Almeida David M

机构信息

Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2025 Mar;29(3):423-434. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2396066. Epub 2024 Aug 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Most studies examining age differences in coping across adulthood come from cross-sectional studies and focus on the broader categories of problem- and emotion-focused coping. We aimed to establish a factor structure for coping items used in a national, longitudinal study of aging (MIDUS) and examine age patterns in coping strategies over 10 years.

METHOD

We performed exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and factorial invariance testing. Next we conducted a series of multilevel models for each coping factor with participants from waves II and III of the MIDUS study ( = 2,661, = 55, 58% women, 84% White).

RESULTS

We found a four-factor solution: instrumental action; denial/disengagement; positive reappraisal; focus and venting of emotions. Invariance was established across time and age. At baseline, age was positively associated with the use of three strategies, though younger adults used more focus and venting of emotions. There was an overall decrease over 10 years in use of all strategies, which was moderated by age. Positive reappraisal declined more steeply among midlife participants, whereas the remaining strategies declined more for older participants.

CONCLUSION

Results highlight the multi-dimensionality of MIDUS coping items and underscores the import of age in understanding changes in coping across midlife and older adulthood.

摘要

目的

大多数关于成年期应对方式年龄差异的研究来自横断面研究,且聚焦于问题聚焦应对和情绪聚焦应对这两个更宽泛的类别。我们旨在为一项全国性的衰老纵向研究(MIDUS)中使用的应对项目建立一个因素结构,并研究10年间应对策略的年龄模式。

方法

我们进行了探索性和验证性因素分析以及因素不变性检验。接下来,我们对MIDUS研究第二波和第三波的参与者(n = 2661,N = 55,58%为女性,84%为白人)就每个应对因素进行了一系列多层次模型分析。

结果

我们发现了一个四因素解决方案:工具性行动;否认/脱离;积极重新评价;情绪聚焦与宣泄。在时间和年龄上建立了不变性。在基线时,年龄与三种策略的使用呈正相关,尽管年轻人更多地使用情绪聚焦与宣泄。在10年期间,所有策略的使用总体上有所下降,且存在年龄差异。积极重新评价在中年参与者中下降得更为陡峭,而其余策略在老年参与者中下降得更多。

结论

结果突出了MIDUS应对项目的多维性,并强调了年龄在理解中年和老年期应对方式变化中的重要性。

相似文献

10
The effects of instrumental reminiscence on resilience and coping in elderly.工具性回忆对老年人恢复力和应对能力的影响。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;60(2):294-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 25.

本文引用的文献

4
Are coping strategies and variability in their use associated with lifespan?应对策略及其使用的变异性是否与寿命有关?
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Nov;162:111035. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111035. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
6
The Factor Structure of the Brief Cope: A Systematic Review.《Brief Cope 量表的因子结构:系统评价》。
West J Nurs Res. 2022 Jun;44(6):612-627. doi: 10.1177/01939459211012044. Epub 2021 May 4.
9
Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges.2020 年代的中年:机遇与挑战。
Am Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;75(4):470-485. doi: 10.1037/amp0000591.
10
Inflammation: The Common Pathway of Stress-Related Diseases.炎症:应激相关疾病的共同途径。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 20;11:316. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00316. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验