• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Longitudinal changes in coping strategies across midlife and older adulthood: findings from the midlife in the United States study.中年及老年期应对策略的纵向变化:来自美国中年研究的结果
Aging Ment Health. 2025 Mar;29(3):423-434. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2396066. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
2
Mechanisms of Racial Health Disparities: Evidence on Coping and Cortisol from MIDUS II.种族健康差异的机制:来自 MIDUS II 的应对和皮质醇的证据。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Apr;7(2):207-216. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00648-y. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Parental warmth during childhood predicts coping and well-being in adulthood.童年时期的父母温暖预示着成年后的应对能力和幸福感。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Aug;32(5):610-621. doi: 10.1037/fam0000401. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Factorial structure and age-related psychometrics of the MIDUS personality adjective items across the life span.人格形容词项目 MIDUS 跨生命周期的因子结构和与年龄相关的心理计量学。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):173-86. doi: 10.1037/a0025265. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
5
Coping Styles as Mediators Between Purpose in Life and Cognitive Function: A Longitudinal Study.应对方式作为生活目的与认知功能之间的中介因素:一项纵向研究。
Res Aging. 2025 Mar-Apr;47(3-4):240-252. doi: 10.1177/01640275241312195. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
6
The relationship between anxiety, coping strategies and characteristics of patients with diabetes.焦虑、应对策略与糖尿病患者特征之间的关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Oct 13;6:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-79.
7
Conscientiousness and mindfulness in midlife coping: An assessment based on MIDUS II.中年应对中的尽责性与正念:基于“美国中年发展调查第二轮(MIDUS II)”的评估
Personal Ment Health. 2016 Feb;10(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1323. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
8
Psychological distress and self-reported mental disorders: the partially mediating role of coping strategies.心理困扰和自我报告的精神障碍:应对策略的部分中介作用。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Mar;37(2):180-191. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2023.2258805. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
9
Mechanisms of Racial Health Disparities: Relationships between Coping and Psychological and Physiological Stress Responses.种族健康差异的机制:应对方式与心理和生理应激反应之间的关系。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Sep 24;30(4):563-574. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.4.563. eCollection 2020 Fall.
10
The effects of instrumental reminiscence on resilience and coping in elderly.工具性回忆对老年人恢复力和应对能力的影响。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;60(2):294-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Preserving What Matters: Longitudinal Changes in Control Over Interpersonal Stress and Noninterpersonal Stress in Daily Life.保留重要的东西:生活中人际压力和非人际压力控制的纵向变化。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Apr 1;79(4). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae012.
2
Perceived control across the adult lifespan: Longitudinal changes in global control and daily stressor control.成人期全生命周期的感知控制:总体控制和日常压力源控制的纵向变化。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Jan;60(1):45-58. doi: 10.1037/dev0001618. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
"Been there, done that:" A grounded theory of future caregiver preparedness in former caregivers of parents living with dementia.“曾经沧海难为水”:痴呆症父母的前照护者对未来照护准备情况的扎根理论。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 May;71(5):1495-1504. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18209. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
4
Are coping strategies and variability in their use associated with lifespan?应对策略及其使用的变异性是否与寿命有关?
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Nov;162:111035. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111035. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Longitudinal Associations of Perceived Mastery and Constraints With Coping and Their Implications for Functional Health for Aging Adults.老年人知觉掌控感和限制感与应对方式的纵向关联及其对功能健康的影响。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2023 Sep;97(2):135-156. doi: 10.1177/00914150221112284. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
6
The Factor Structure of the Brief Cope: A Systematic Review.《Brief Cope 量表的因子结构:系统评价》。
West J Nurs Res. 2022 Jun;44(6):612-627. doi: 10.1177/01939459211012044. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Coping strategies mediate the relation between executive functions and life satisfaction in middle and late adulthood: a structural equational analysis.应对策略在中老年期执行功能与生活满意度之间起中介作用:一项结构方程分析。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2022 Sep;29(5):761-780. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2021.1917502. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
8
Charting adult development through (historically changing) daily stress processes.通过(历史上不断变化的)日常压力过程来描绘成人发展。
Am Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;75(4):511-524. doi: 10.1037/amp0000597.
9
Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges.2020 年代的中年:机遇与挑战。
Am Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;75(4):470-485. doi: 10.1037/amp0000591.
10
Inflammation: The Common Pathway of Stress-Related Diseases.炎症:应激相关疾病的共同途径。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 20;11:316. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00316. eCollection 2017.

中年及老年期应对策略的纵向变化:来自美国中年研究的结果

Longitudinal changes in coping strategies across midlife and older adulthood: findings from the midlife in the United States study.

作者信息

Kurth Maria L, Witzel Dakota D, Cerino Eric S, Almeida David M

机构信息

Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2025 Mar;29(3):423-434. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2396066. Epub 2024 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2024.2396066
PMID:39188048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11861384/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Most studies examining age differences in coping across adulthood come from cross-sectional studies and focus on the broader categories of problem- and emotion-focused coping. We aimed to establish a factor structure for coping items used in a national, longitudinal study of aging (MIDUS) and examine age patterns in coping strategies over 10 years.

METHOD

We performed exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and factorial invariance testing. Next we conducted a series of multilevel models for each coping factor with participants from waves II and III of the MIDUS study ( = 2,661, = 55, 58% women, 84% White).

RESULTS

We found a four-factor solution: instrumental action; denial/disengagement; positive reappraisal; focus and venting of emotions. Invariance was established across time and age. At baseline, age was positively associated with the use of three strategies, though younger adults used more focus and venting of emotions. There was an overall decrease over 10 years in use of all strategies, which was moderated by age. Positive reappraisal declined more steeply among midlife participants, whereas the remaining strategies declined more for older participants.

CONCLUSION

Results highlight the multi-dimensionality of MIDUS coping items and underscores the import of age in understanding changes in coping across midlife and older adulthood.

摘要

目的

大多数关于成年期应对方式年龄差异的研究来自横断面研究,且聚焦于问题聚焦应对和情绪聚焦应对这两个更宽泛的类别。我们旨在为一项全国性的衰老纵向研究(MIDUS)中使用的应对项目建立一个因素结构,并研究10年间应对策略的年龄模式。

方法

我们进行了探索性和验证性因素分析以及因素不变性检验。接下来,我们对MIDUS研究第二波和第三波的参与者(n = 2661,N = 55,58%为女性,84%为白人)就每个应对因素进行了一系列多层次模型分析。

结果

我们发现了一个四因素解决方案:工具性行动;否认/脱离;积极重新评价;情绪聚焦与宣泄。在时间和年龄上建立了不变性。在基线时,年龄与三种策略的使用呈正相关,尽管年轻人更多地使用情绪聚焦与宣泄。在10年期间,所有策略的使用总体上有所下降,且存在年龄差异。积极重新评价在中年参与者中下降得更为陡峭,而其余策略在老年参与者中下降得更多。

结论

结果突出了MIDUS应对项目的多维性,并强调了年龄在理解中年和老年期应对方式变化中的重要性。