Suppr超能文献

情绪障碍混合式团体跨诊断治疗的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Effectiveness of a blended group transdiagnostic treatment for emotional disorders: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Jiménez-Orenga Noelia, Díaz-García Amanda, García-Palacios Azucena, Bretón-López Juani

机构信息

Department of Basic, Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.

Department of Psychology and Sociology, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2024 Jul 30;37:100761. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100761. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Emotional disorders (ED) (mood and anxiety disorders) are very prevalent and disabling, and often appear in comorbid presentations. Although there are effective treatments for these disorders, there is still a large gap between the number of people who need them and those who actually receive them. The combination of three strategies may help in this regard, facilitating the dissemination and accessibility of treatment: the transdiagnostic perspective of ED, the group format, and the use of technologies in a blended format (i.e., the combination of online and face-to-face therapy elements). This study intends to compare the efficacy of a new ED intervention, a transdiagnostic group treatment protocol administered in a blended format, with that of a face-to-face treatment. This article describes the study protocol for the randomized controlled trial.

METHOD AND ANALYSES

A two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) will be conducted. Participants ( = 144) will be adult volunteers suffering from DSM-5 anxiety and/or depressive disorders and will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: Face-to-face Group Transdiagnostic Protocol or Blended Group Transdiagnostic Protocol. The face-to-face condition will consist of a total of 16 weekly face-to-face group sessions, while the blended condition will consist of 8 biweekly face-to-face group sessions in combination with self-applied work through a web platform. Clinical and acceptability measures will be included in both groups. Assessments will be performed at baseline, during the treatment, at post-treatment, and at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. This study received the approval of the Ethics Committee of Universitat Jaume I in October 2021 (CD/91/2021). Intention-to-treat analyses will be performed. Statistical analyses will be carried out using SPSS version 28.0. The results will be reported in accordance with CONSORT recommendations.

DISCUSSION

This is the first RCT to compare the effectiveness of an ED treatment protocol based on the transdiagnostic perspective and applied in group and blended format. It will offer relevant data to continue moving forward towards treatment alternatives that are cost-effective and more accessible, so that all patients with ED who require them can benefit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05569018. Registered 06 October 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05569018.

摘要

引言

情绪障碍(ED)(情绪和焦虑障碍)非常普遍且具有致残性,并且常常以共病形式出现。尽管针对这些障碍有有效的治疗方法,但在需要治疗的人数与实际接受治疗的人数之间仍存在很大差距。在这方面,三种策略的结合可能会有所帮助,有助于治疗的传播和可及性:情绪障碍的跨诊断视角、小组形式以及混合形式使用技术(即在线和面对面治疗元素的结合)。本研究旨在比较一种新的情绪障碍干预措施(一种以混合形式实施的跨诊断小组治疗方案)与面对面治疗的疗效。本文描述了该随机对照试验的研究方案。

方法与分析

将进行一项双臂、平行组、随机对照临床试验(RCT)。参与者(n = 144)将是患有DSM-5焦虑和/或抑郁障碍的成年志愿者,并将被随机分配到两种情况之一:面对面小组跨诊断方案或混合小组跨诊断方案。面对面组将总共进行16次每周一次的面对面小组会议,而混合组将包括8次每两周一次的面对面小组会议,并结合通过网络平台进行的自我练习。两组都将纳入临床和可接受性测量。评估将在基线、治疗期间、治疗后以及3个月、6个月和12个月随访时进行。本研究于2021年10月获得了哈梅一世大学伦理委员会的批准(CD/91/2021)。将进行意向性分析。将使用SPSS 28.0版进行统计分析。结果将按照CONSORT建议进行报告。

讨论

这是第一项比较基于跨诊断视角并以小组和混合形式应用的情绪障碍治疗方案有效性的RCT。它将提供相关数据,以继续朝着具有成本效益且更易获得的治疗替代方案迈进,以便所有需要的情绪障碍患者都能从中受益。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05569018。于2022年10月6日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05569018。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0562/11345571/1c21ff370b46/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验