Barnes Laura L, Holland Michael C, Lentz Rachel, Knox Jacquelyn A, Sbitany Hani, Piper Merisa
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Aug 26;12(8):e6100. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006100. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Rectus abdominis flap coverage of high-risk perineal wounds following extirpative pelvic procedures can result in improved perineal outcomes. However, rectus abdominis flap harvest has morbidity associated with the donor site, including hernia or bulge development. The risk-benefit profile of mesh use in this scenario is not well-defined in the literature.
We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent rectus abdominis flap coverage of pelvic defects at our institution during July 2012-January 2021. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether mesh was used and whether primary fascial closure was achieved. Donor site outcomes were analyzed between groups.
One hundred consecutive patients were included. When considering all patients in whom primary fascial closure was achieved, the use of mesh did not significantly decrease rates of hernia development. Mesh use in this setting was associated with significantly greater rates of infection, requiring procedural intervention (12% versus 0%, = 0.044). When considering all patients in whom mesh was used, primary fascial closure was associated with decreased rates of hernia development, and this trended toward significance (16.1% versus 0.0%, = 0.058).
When closing a pedicled rectus abdominis flap donor site, if primary fascial closure is achievable, the addition of mesh to reinforce the repair does not have an added benefit. Mesh use in this setting was not shown to prevent hernia or bulge development, and was found to be associated with significantly greater rates of infection, requiring procedural intervention.
在盆腔切除术后,使用腹直肌皮瓣覆盖高危会阴伤口可改善会阴预后。然而,切取腹直肌皮瓣会导致供区出现并发症,包括疝气或隆起。在这种情况下使用补片的风险效益情况在文献中尚无明确界定。
我们对2012年7月至2021年1月期间在本机构接受腹直肌皮瓣覆盖盆腔缺损的所有患者进行了回顾性病历审查。评估患者特征和术后结果。根据是否使用补片以及是否实现一期筋膜闭合将患者分层。分析组间供区结果。
纳入连续100例患者。在考虑所有实现一期筋膜闭合的患者时,使用补片并未显著降低疝气发生率。在这种情况下使用补片与更高的感染率相关,需要进行手术干预(12%对0%,P = 0.044)。在考虑所有使用补片的患者时,一期筋膜闭合与疝气发生率降低相关,且这一趋势接近显著水平(16.1%对0.0%,P = 0.058)。
在关闭带蒂腹直肌皮瓣供区时,如果能够实现一期筋膜闭合,添加补片加强修复并无额外益处。在这种情况下使用补片未显示可预防疝气或隆起,且发现与更高的感染率相关,需要进行手术干预。