Zaidman Craig M, Crockett Cameron D, Wedge Ethan, Tabatabai Grace, Goedeker Natalie
Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Aug 16;10(3):58. doi: 10.3390/ijns10030058.
In the United States (U.S.), newborn screening (NBS) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is implemented by individual states. There is likely variation in the practice patterns of state NBS programs and among the providers caring for newborns with SMA. This is a prospective, descriptive, observational study that seeks to quantify and describe practice patterns and heterogeneities in state NBS programs and provider practices in the U.S. We surveyed U.S. state NBS programs and care providers of newborns with SMA. Thirty states and 41 practitioners responded. NBS program practices vary by state. Most (74%) state programs provide results to both primary care and specialist providers and also defer confirmatory SMA testing to those providers. Two states had relatively high rates of false-positive or inclusive results. The total birth prevalence of SMA was 1:13,862. Most providers were in tertiary care centers (90%) and were child neurologists (81%) and/or had fellowship training in Neuromuscular Medicine or Electromyography (76%). All providers see new referrals in less than a week, but many do not initiate treatment until >3 weeks of age (39%), with most commonly reported delays related to insurance processes. Most (81%) prefer onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi (OA) as the treatment of choice, mainly due to perceived efficacy and the route/frequency of administration. NBS practice patterns in the U.S. vary by state but overall yielded the predicted birth prevalence of positive results. Providers evaluate these newborns urgently, but many do not initiate therapy until after 3 weeks of age. Treatment delays are mainly related to insurance processes.
在美国,各州负责实施针对脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)的新生儿筛查(NBS)。各州NBS项目的实践模式以及照顾SMA新生儿的医疗服务提供者之间可能存在差异。这是一项前瞻性、描述性观察性研究,旨在量化和描述美国各州NBS项目及医疗服务提供者实践中的模式和异质性。我们对美国各州NBS项目及SMA新生儿的护理提供者进行了调查。30个州和41名从业者做出了回应。NBS项目的实践因州而异。大多数(74%)州项目会向初级保健和专科医疗服务提供者提供检测结果,并且也将SMA确诊检测工作交由这些提供者负责。有两个州出现假阳性或不确定性结果的比例相对较高。SMA的总体出生患病率为1:13,862。大多数医疗服务提供者在三级医疗中心工作(90%),是儿童神经科医生(81%)和/或接受过神经肌肉医学或肌电图学专项培训(76%)。所有医疗服务提供者在不到一周的时间内就能接待新转诊患者,但许多人直到婴儿3周龄后才开始治疗(39%),最常报告的延误原因与保险流程有关。大多数(81%)医疗服务提供者更倾向于选择onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi(OA)作为治疗选择,主要是因为其疗效以及给药途径/频率。美国的NBS实践模式因州而异,但总体上得到了预测的阳性结果出生患病率。医疗服务提供者会紧急评估这些新生儿,但许多人直到3周龄后才开始治疗。治疗延误主要与保险流程有关。