Wolff K
Hautarzt. 1985 Jan;36(1):25-33.
Photochemotherapy (PUVA) clears severe psoriasis in 90% of cases and is therefore the most effective treatment available for this disease. Stringent criteria are required with regard to patient selection, dosimetry and follow-up. Therefore PUVA should only be performed by appropriately trained and experienced dermatologists who are sufficiently qualified to weigh the severity of the disease against potential side-effects, and to consider the respective risk/benefit ratio of other alternative treatment methods before initiating treatment. As is the case with other forms of chemotherapy, PUVA also carries the risk of long-term side-effects (particularly actinic carcinogenesis) similar to those of long-term, high-intensity ultra-violet radiation. As yet it is not sufficiently clear whether PUVA acts as a true carcinogen or as a promoter and whether the immunosuppression exerted by PUVA under experimental conditions is clinically relevant. For these reasons and because PUVA requires continuous monitoring of patients, it is neither suitable for minor cases, nor for mass therapy or treatment at home. It is, however, the treatment of choice for severe psoriasis and for those forms of psoriasis which represent a decisive professional and social handicap for the patient. Before a decision is made to employ PUVA as a treatment for psoriasis, its benefits and risks should be compared with those of alternative forms of treatment, which should be subjected to equally stringent evaluation criteria.
光化学疗法(PUVA)可使90%的重度银屑病患者病情缓解,因此是治疗该病最有效的方法。在患者选择、剂量测定和随访方面需要严格的标准。因此,PUVA治疗仅应由经过适当培训且经验丰富、有足够资质权衡疾病严重程度与潜在副作用,并在开始治疗前考虑其他替代治疗方法各自风险/获益比的皮肤科医生进行。与其他化疗形式一样,PUVA也存在长期副作用风险(尤其是光化性致癌作用),与长期高强度紫外线辐射的副作用类似。目前尚不清楚PUVA是真正的致癌物还是促进剂,以及PUVA在实验条件下产生的免疫抑制作用在临床上是否相关。出于这些原因,以及因为PUVA需要对患者进行持续监测,所以它既不适用于轻症病例,也不适用于大规模治疗或家庭治疗。然而,对于重度银屑病以及那些对患者构成决定性职业和社会障碍的银屑病类型,它是首选治疗方法。在决定将PUVA用作银屑病治疗方法之前,应将其益处和风险与替代治疗方法的进行比较,替代治疗方法也应遵循同样严格的评估标准。