Klingebiel Felix Karl-Ludwig, Kalbas Yannik, Klee Octavia, Long Anhua, Teuben Michel, Teuber Henrik, Halvachizadeh Sascha, Berk Till, Neuhaus Valentin, Pape Hans-Christoph, Pfeifer Roman
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.
Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2987-2997. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02649-x. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
The emergency treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries is still a challenge and requires surgical and anesthesiological resuscitation. Emergency fixation of the unstable pelvic ring with percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screws, also known as "Rescue Screws", is an established treatment method. The aim of our study was to compare the outcome and complication rates of "Rescue Screws" with elective SI-screw fixations.
A 1:1 ratio nearest-neighbor matched, retrospective cohort study of trauma patients with acute pelvic ring injuries at a level one trauma center was performed. Patients ≥ 15 years, treated with SI-screw fixation were included.
pathologic fractures, missing consent and navigated procedures. The primary outcome parameters was defined as SI-screw revision operations. Patients were stratified according to treatment strategy (RS: Rescue Screws; EL: elective SI-screws).
From 392 patients identified between 11/2014 and 08/2021, 186 met the inclusion criteria with 41 in the RS Group and 145 in the EL group. After matching, 41 patients were included in each group with similar baseline characteristics except persistent hemodynamic shock (RS: n = 22 (53.37%) vs. EL: n = 1 (4.3%), p < 0.001). Surgical characteristics were comparable in terms of instrumentation levels and insertion-sites. No significant differences were observed in the outcome parameters (revisions, reoperations, implant-associated complications, LOS and mortality) between both groups.
Treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures with Rescue Screws appears as a feasible treatment option for emergency stabilization. Rescue Screws are not associated with elevated revision rates and increased complications rates. This minimally invasive technique enables safe emergency stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring. Prospective or randomized clinical trials are required to directly compare Rescue Screws with other competing emergency stabilization techniques.
不稳定骨盆环损伤的急诊治疗仍是一项挑战,需要手术和麻醉复苏。经皮骶髂螺钉(SI螺钉)紧急固定不稳定骨盆环,即所谓的“救援螺钉”,是一种成熟的治疗方法。我们研究的目的是比较“救援螺钉”与择期SI螺钉固定的疗效和并发症发生率。
在一级创伤中心对急性骨盆环损伤的创伤患者进行1:1比例最近邻匹配的回顾性队列研究。纳入年龄≥15岁、接受SI螺钉固定治疗的患者。
病理性骨折、未获得同意和导航手术。主要结局参数定义为SI螺钉翻修手术。患者根据治疗策略进行分层(RS:救援螺钉;EL:择期SI螺钉)。
在2014年11月至2021年8月期间确定的392例患者中,186例符合纳入标准,其中RS组41例,EL组145例。匹配后,每组纳入41例患者,除持续性血流动力学休克外,基线特征相似(RS:n = 22(53.37%) vs. EL:n = 1(4.3%),p < 0.001)。手术特征在器械置入水平和置入部位方面具有可比性。两组在结局参数(翻修、再次手术、植入物相关并发症、住院时间和死亡率)方面未观察到显著差异。
使用救援螺钉治疗不稳定骨盆环骨折似乎是一种可行的急诊稳定治疗选择。救援螺钉与翻修率升高和并发症发生率增加无关。这种微创技术能够安全地急诊稳定骨盆后环。需要进行前瞻性或随机临床试验,以直接比较救援螺钉与其他竞争性急诊稳定技术。