Suppr超能文献

动脉自旋标记磁共振成像检测脑动静脉畸形的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of arterial spin labeling MR imaging in detecting cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Aug 27;47(1):492. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02659-8.

Abstract

Diagnostic accuracy of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is imperative for delineating management. The current standard is digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is an understudied noninvasive, non-contrast technique that allows angioarchitecture visualization and additionally quantifies cortical and AVM cerebral blood flow and hemodynamics. This meta-analysis aims to compare ASL and DSA imaging in detecting and characterizing cerebral AVMs. EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were queried from inception to July 2022 for reports of AVMs evaluated by DSA and ASL imaging. Fourteen studies with 278 patients evaluated using DSA and ASL imaging prior to intervention were included; pCASL in 11 studies (n = 239, 85.37%) and PASL in three studies (n = 41, 14.64%). The overall AVM detection rate on ASL was 99% (CI 97-100%); subgroup analysis revealed no difference between pCASL vs. PASL (99%; CI 96-100% vs. 100%; CI 95-100% respectively, p = 0.42). The correlation value comparing ASL and DSA nidus size was 0.99. DSA and ASL intermodality agreement Cohen's k factor for Spetzler Martin Grading (SMG) was reported at a median of 0.98 (IQR 0.73-0.1), with a 1.0 agreement on SMG classification. A median of 25 arteries were detected by DSA (IQR 14.5-27), vs. 25 by ASL (IQR 14.5-27.5) at a median 0.92 k factor. ASL provides angioarchitectural visualization noninferior to DSA and additionally quantifies CBF. Our study suggests that ASL should be considered in the detection of AVMs, especially in patients with contrast contraindications or apprehension towards an invasive assessment.

摘要

动静脉畸形(AVM)的诊断准确性对于明确治疗方案至关重要。目前的标准是数字减影血管造影(DSA)。动脉自旋标记(ASL)是一种研究较少的非侵入性、非对比技术,可用于血管成像,并可定量评估皮质和 AVM 脑血流和血液动力学。本荟萃分析旨在比较 ASL 和 DSA 成像在检测和表征脑 AVM 方面的性能。从 1977 年开始,在 EMBASE、Medline、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库中检索了关于 DSA 和 ASL 成像评估 AVM 的报告。共有 14 项研究纳入了 278 名接受 DSA 和 ASL 成像检查的患者,其中 11 项研究使用了质子标记动脉自旋标记(pCASL)(n=239,85.37%),3 项研究使用了动脉自旋标记(PASL)(n=41,14.64%)。ASL 的总体 AVM 检测率为 99%(CI 97-100%);亚组分析显示 pCASL 与 PASL 之间无差异(99%;CI 96-100% vs. 100%;CI 95-100%,p=0.42)。比较 ASL 和 DSA 供血动脉的相关性值为 0.99。报道的 DSA 和 ASL 间模态一致性 Cohen's k 因子用于 Spetzler Martin 分级(SMG)的中位数为 0.98(IQR 0.73-0.1),SMG 分类的一致性为 1.0。DSA 检测到的中位数为 25 条动脉(IQR 14.5-27),ASL 检测到的中位数为 25 条动脉(IQR 14.5-27.5),k 因子中位数为 0.92。ASL 可提供与 DSA 相似的血管成像效果,并且还可以定量评估 CBF。本研究表明,ASL 应考虑用于检测 AVM,特别是在有造影剂禁忌或对侵入性评估有顾虑的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验