Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Oct 1;45(9):1012-1015. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004295. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
The recent Field Corrective Action (FCA) for the HiRes Ultra and Ultra 3D (V1) cochlear implants (CIs) triggered much research investigating clinical identification, failure rates, and postrevision outcomes. Pediatric data remain limited, especially with regards to speech outcomes. We aim to characterize the trajectory of children implanted with these devices with specific attention to speech outcomes.
Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with FCA-affected CIs from March 2017 to January 2020 at a tertiary children's hospital.
CI placement, device monitoring, audiologic evaluation, revision surgery.
CI failure rates, revision surgery rate, speech recognition outcomes.
Forty-one devices were implanted in 27 pediatric patients. Average age at implantation was 4.01 years (range, 0.87-12.75). To date, 30 devices (73%) are known failures with 90% of these having undergone revision surgery. No statically significant difference was noted on open-set speech testing across best prerevision, immediate prerevision, and best postrevision time points. Best postrevision CNC scores had a mean score of 71% ± 26%, n = 16.
Pediatric patients implanted with FCA-affected CI devices have a high risk of device failure. Open-set speech recognition was not significantly different from prerevision to postrevision testing, suggesting preserved speech outcomes. This may be partially attributable to limitations of cohort size and the pediatric population with open-set speech testing. However, we suspect that close follow-up with standardized testing and a low threshold for revision surgery provided by our multidisciplinary team may have mitigated these changes. Postrevision open-set speech testing remains positive for these patients.
最近对 HiRes Ultra 和 Ultra 3D(V1)人工耳蜗(CI)的现场纠正行动(FCA)引发了大量研究,旨在调查临床识别、失败率和修正后结果。儿科数据仍然有限,尤其是在言语结果方面。我们旨在描述接受这些设备植入的儿童的轨迹,特别关注言语结果。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2017 年 3 月至 2020 年 1 月期间在一家三级儿童医院接受 FCA 影响的 CI 植入的儿科患者。
CI 植入、设备监测、听力学评估、修正手术。
CI 失败率、修正手术率、言语识别结果。
27 名儿科患者共植入 41 个设备。平均植入年龄为 4.01 岁(范围:0.87-12.75 岁)。迄今为止,已知 30 个设备(73%)发生故障,其中 90%的设备已接受修正手术。在最佳术前、即刻术前和最佳术后时间点,开放式言语测试的结果无统计学差异。最佳术后 CNC 得分的平均得分为 71%±26%,n=16。
植入 FCA 影响的 CI 设备的儿科患者设备故障风险较高。与术前相比,开放式言语识别在术后测试中没有显著差异,这表明言语结果得到了保留。这可能部分归因于队列规模和接受开放式言语测试的儿科人群的限制。然而,我们怀疑我们的多学科团队提供的密切随访、标准化测试和修正手术的低门槛可能减轻了这些变化。这些患者的术后开放式言语测试仍然为阳性。