Farm Animal Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.151, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-4801, USA.
Poult Sci. 2024 Nov;103(11):104197. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104197. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
In the Netherlands, the number of broiler production systems with higher welfare standards, using slower-growing broilers and decreased stocking densities, has increased over the last decade. This study aimed to investigate the effect of this change on antibiotic treatments, mortality, and footpad lesions. Data from national monitoring databases from 2013 to 2021 were used, resulting in 113,380 included flocks from 917 farms. Flocks were divided into conventional (CONV), medium-growing (MED), and slow-growing (SLOW), based on breed and slaughter age (median age: CONV 42 d; MED 50 d; SLOW 56 d). Generalized mixed-effect models were created to compare antibiotic treatments in and after the first week, total on-farm mortality, and footpad lesion scores between these 3 production systems. Year, quarter, flock size, thinning, number of houses, and regional density of poultry farms were included as fixed effects. Random effects were farm and veterinary practice in all models, with an additional random slaughterhouse effect to describe footpad lesions. Probability of treatment in the first week of age in CONV flocks overall years (7.2%, 95% CI [5.9, 8.7]) was higher than in MED (2.0%, 95% CI [1.6, 2.5]) and SLOW flocks (1.3%, 95% CI [1.0, 1.7]). Treatment probability after the first week was similarly higher in CONV flocks (14.7%, 95% CI [12.1, 17.6]) than in MED (3.2%, 95% CI [2.5, 4.0]) and SLOW flocks (2.2%, 95% CI [1.7, 2.9]). CONV flocks had a higher mean mortality (3.2%, 95% CI [3.0, 3.4]) than MED (2.0%, 95% CI [1.9, 2.1]) and SLOW flocks (1.9%, 95% CI [1.8, 2.0]). Regarding footpad lesions, CONV flocks had the highest mean scores (range 0-200) over all years, whereas SLOW flocks had the lowest scores (CONV: 46.1, 95% CI [42.1, 50.6]; MED: 21.3, 95% CI [18.9, 24.0]; SLOW: 13.2, 95% CI [11.5, 15.1]). This analysis of data from flocks over a 9-yr period indicates that switching from conventional to alternative production systems with higher welfare standards could positively affect broiler health and antibiotic use.
在过去十年中,荷兰采用更高福利标准的肉鸡生产系统(使用生长速度较慢的肉鸡和降低饲养密度)的数量有所增加。本研究旨在调查这种变化对抗生素治疗、死亡率和脚垫病变的影响。使用了 2013 年至 2021 年国家监测数据库的数据,共纳入了来自 917 个农场的 113380 个鸡群。根据品种和屠宰年龄,鸡群分为常规(CONV)、中速生长(MED)和慢速生长(SLOW)(中位数年龄:CONV 42 天;MED 50 天;SLOW 56 天)。创建了广义混合效应模型,以比较这 3 种生产系统在第一周及之后的抗生素治疗、农场总死亡率和脚垫病变评分。年份、季度、鸡群规模、疏苗、房屋数量以及家禽养殖场的区域密度被纳入固定效应。所有模型中的随机效应均为农场和兽医实践,额外的随机屠宰场效应用于描述脚垫病变。各年总体上 CONV 鸡群在第一周龄时接受治疗的概率(7.2%,95%CI[5.9,8.7])高于 MED(2.0%,95%CI[1.6,2.5])和 SLOW 鸡群(1.3%,95%CI[1.0,1.7])。在第一周之后接受治疗的概率,CONV 鸡群(14.7%,95%CI[12.1,17.6])也明显高于 MED(3.2%,95%CI[2.5,4.0])和 SLOW 鸡群(2.2%,95%CI[1.7,2.9])。CONV 鸡群的平均死亡率(3.2%,95%CI[3.0,3.4])高于 MED(2.0%,95%CI[1.9,2.1])和 SLOW 鸡群(1.9%,95%CI[1.8,2.0])。关于脚垫病变,各年总体上 CONV 鸡群的平均评分(0-200 分)最高,而 SLOW 鸡群的评分最低(CONV:46.1,95%CI[42.1,50.6];MED:21.3,95%CI[18.9,24.0];SLOW:13.2,95%CI[11.5,15.1])。对 9 年来鸡群数据的分析表明,从常规生产系统转向福利更高的替代生产系统可能会对肉鸡的健康和抗生素的使用产生积极影响。