Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States of America.
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Queen Rania St, Amman, 11942, Jordan; Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210(th) Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States of America.
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Nov;98:111567. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111567. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
A low dynamic driving pressure during mechanical ventilation for general anesthesia has been associated with a lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications (PRC), a key driver of healthcare costs. It is, however, unclear whether maintaining low driving pressure is clinically relevant to measure and contain costs. We hypothesized that a lower dynamic driving pressure is associated with lower costs.
Multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Two academic healthcare networks in New York and Massachusetts, USA.
46,715 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia for non-ambulatory (inpatient and same-day admission) surgery between 2016 and 2021.
The primary exposure was the median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure.
The primary outcome was direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs, which were matched with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to report absolute differences in total costs in United States Dollars (US$). We assessed effect modification by patients' baseline risk of PRC (score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications [SPORC] ≥ 7) and effect mediation by rates of PRC (including post-extubation saturation < 90%, re-intubation or non-invasive ventilation within 7 days) and other major complications.
The median intraoperative dynamic driving pressure was 17.2cmHO (IQR 14.0-21.3cmHO). In adjusted analyses, every 5cmHO reduction in dynamic driving pressure was associated with a decrease of -0.7% in direct perioperative healthcare-associated costs (95%CI -1.3 to -0.1%; p = 0.020). When a dynamic driving pressure below 15cmHO was maintained, -US$340 lower total perioperative healthcare-associated costs were observed (95%CI -US$546 to -US$132; p = 0.001). This association was limited to patients at high baseline risk of PRC (n = 4059; -US$1755;97.5%CI -US$2495 to -US$986; p < 0.001), where lower risks of PRC and other major complications mediated 10.7% and 7.2% of this association (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively).
Intraoperative mechanical ventilation targeting low dynamic driving pressures could be a relevant measure to reduce perioperative healthcare-associated costs in high-risk patients.
机械通气时较低的动态驱动压与术后呼吸并发症(PRC)风险降低有关,而 PRC 是医疗保健成本的主要驱动因素。然而,维持较低的驱动压是否与降低成本具有临床相关性尚不清楚。我们假设较低的动态驱动压与较低的成本相关。
多中心回顾性队列研究。
美国纽约和马萨诸塞州的两个学术医疗保健网络。
2016 年至 2021 年间,46715 名接受全麻的非活动(住院和当天入院)手术的成年手术患者。
主要暴露是术中中位数动态驱动压力。
主要结局是直接围手术期医疗保健相关成本,并与 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample(HCUP-NIS)的数据相匹配,以报告以美元(US$)表示的总费用的绝对差异。我们评估了患者 PRC 基线风险(术后呼吸并发症预测评分[SPORC]≥7)的效应修饰作用,并通过 PRC 发生率(包括拔管后饱和度<90%、7 天内重新插管或无创通气)和其他主要并发症的效应中介作用进行了评估。
术中中位数动态驱动压力为 17.2cmHO(IQR 14.0-21.3cmHO)。在调整后的分析中,动态驱动压力每降低 5cmHO,直接围手术期医疗保健相关成本降低 0.7%(95%CI -1.3 至 -0.1%;p=0.020)。当维持 15cmHO 以下的动态驱动压力时,观察到围手术期医疗保健相关总成本降低 340 美元(95%CI -546 至 -132 美元;p=0.001)。这种关联仅限于 PRC 基线风险较高的患者(n=4059;-1755 美元;97.5%CI -2495 至 -986 美元;p<0.001),其中 PRC 和其他主要并发症的风险降低分别解释了这种关联的 10.7%和 7.2%(p<0.001 和 p=0.015)。
针对低动态驱动压的术中机械通气可能是降低高危患者围手术期医疗保健相关成本的一项相关措施。