Suppr超能文献

在词汇判断任务中,mOTS-words 和 pOTS-words 都更喜欢表情符号刺激而不是文本刺激。

Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a lexical judgment task.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, Marburg 35032, Germany.

Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior-CMBB, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen and Technische Universität Darmstadt Hans-Meerwein-Straße 6, Marburg 35032, Germany.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2024 Aug 1;34(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae339.

Abstract

The visual word form area in the occipitotemporal sulcus (here OTS-words) is crucial for reading and shows a preference for text stimuli. We hypothesized that this text preference may be driven by lexical processing. Hence, we performed three fMRI experiments (n = 15), systematically varying participants' task and stimulus, and separately evaluated middle mOTS-words and posterior pOTS-words. Experiment 1 contrasted text with other visual stimuli to identify both OTS-words subregions. Experiment 2 utilized an fMRI adaptation paradigm, presenting compound words as texts or emojis. In experiment 3, participants performed a lexical or color judgment task on compound words in text or emoji format. In experiment 2, pOTS-words, but not mOTS-words, showed fMRI adaptation for compound words in both formats. In experiment 3, both subregions showed higher responses to compound words in emoji format. Moreover, mOTS-words showed higher responses during the lexical judgment task and a task-stimulus interaction. Multivariate analyses revealed that distributed responses in pOTS-words encode stimulus and distributed responses in mOTS-words encode stimulus and task. Together, our findings suggest that the function of the OTS-words subregions goes beyond the specific visual processing of text and that these regions are flexibly recruited whenever semantic meaning needs to be assigned to visual input.

摘要

枕颞沟中的视觉词形区(这里称为 OTS-words)对于阅读至关重要,并且对文本刺激表现出偏好。我们假设这种文本偏好可能是由词汇处理驱动的。因此,我们进行了三项 fMRI 实验(n=15),系统地改变了参与者的任务和刺激,并分别评估了中间 OTS-words 和后部 OTS-words。实验 1 通过对比文本与其他视觉刺激来识别 OTS-words 的两个亚区。实验 2 利用 fMRI 适应范式,以文本或表情符号呈现复合词。在实验 3 中,参与者以文本或表情符号格式对复合词进行词汇或颜色判断任务。在实验 2 中,pOTS-words 而非 mOTS-words 在两种格式下均对复合词表现出 fMRI 适应。在实验 3 中,两个亚区对表情符号格式的复合词均表现出更高的反应。此外,mOTS-words 在词汇判断任务中表现出更高的反应,并且存在任务-刺激相互作用。多元分析显示,pOTS-words 中的分布式响应编码刺激和任务,而 mOTS-words 中的分布式响应编码刺激。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,OTS-words 亚区的功能不仅仅是文本的特定视觉处理,这些区域在需要将语义意义赋予视觉输入时会灵活地被招募。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cab/11349430/f16fc7d24317/bhae339f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验