Suppr超能文献

撒哈拉以南非洲地区艾滋病毒检测服务的成本:系统文献回顾。

Costs of HIV testing services in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic literature review.

机构信息

Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 27;22(Suppl 1):980. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09770-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review HIV testing services (HTS) costs in sub-Saharan Africa.

DESIGN

A systematic literature review of studies published from January 2006 to October 2020.

METHODS

We searched ten electronic databases for studies that reported estimates for cost per person tested ($pptested) and cost per HIV-positive person identified ($ppositive) in sub-Saharan Africa. We explored variations in incremental cost estimates by testing modality (health facility-based, home-based, mobile-service, self-testing, campaign-style, and stand-alone), by primary or secondary/index HTS, and by population (general population, people living with HIV, antenatal care male partner, antenatal care/postnatal women and key populations). All costs are presented in 2019US$.

RESULTS

Sixty-five studies reported 167 cost estimates. Most reported only $pptested (90%), while (10%) reported the $ppositive. Costs were highly skewed. The lowest mean $pptested was self-testing at $12.75 (median = $11.50); primary testing at $16.63 (median = $10.68); in the general population, $14.06 (median = $10.13). The highest costs were in campaign-style at $27.64 (median = $26.70), secondary/index testing at $27.52 (median = $15.85), and antenatal male partner at $47.94 (median = $55.19). Incremental $ppositive was lowest for home-based at $297.09 (median = $246.75); primary testing $352.31 (median = $157.03); in the general population, $262.89 (median: $140.13).

CONCLUSION

While many studies reported the incremental costs of different HIV testing modalities, few presented full costs. Although the $pptested estimates varied widely, the costs for stand-alone, health facility, home-based, and mobile services were comparable, while substantially higher for campaign-style HTS and the lowest for HIV self-testing. Our review informs policymakers of the affordability of various HTS to ensure universal access to HIV testing.

摘要

目的

回顾撒哈拉以南非洲的艾滋病毒检测服务(HTS)成本。

设计

对 2006 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月发表的研究进行系统文献回顾。

方法

我们在十个电子数据库中搜索了报告撒哈拉以南非洲地区每检测一人的费用($pptested)和每发现一名艾滋病毒阳性者的费用($ppositive)估计值的研究。我们通过检测方式(基于卫生机构、家庭、移动服务、自我检测、运动式和独立式)、初级或二级/索引 HTS 以及人群(普通人群、艾滋病毒感染者、产前保健男性伴侣、产前保健/产后妇女和重点人群)来探讨增量成本估计的差异。所有成本均以 2019 年美元表示。

结果

65 项研究报告了 167 项成本估算。大多数仅报告了$pptested(90%),而(10%)报告了$ppositive。成本高度偏斜。最低的平均$pptested 是自我检测,为 12.75 美元(中位数=11.50 美元);初级检测为 16.63 美元(中位数=10.68 美元);在普通人群中,为 14.06 美元(中位数=10.13 美元)。最高的成本是运动式检测,为 27.64 美元(中位数=26.70 美元),二级/索引检测为 27.52 美元(中位数=15.85 美元),产前男性伴侣检测为 47.94 美元(中位数=55.19 美元)。家庭为基础的增量$ppositive 最低,为 297.09 美元(中位数=246.75 美元);初级检测为 352.31 美元(中位数=157.03 美元);在普通人群中,为 262.89 美元(中位数:140.13 美元)。

结论

尽管许多研究报告了不同艾滋病毒检测方式的增量成本,但很少有研究报告了全部成本。虽然$pptested 估计值差异很大,但独立、卫生机构、家庭和移动服务的成本相当,而运动式 HTS 的成本要高得多,自我检测的成本则最低。我们的审查使决策者了解各种 HTS 的负担能力,以确保普及艾滋病毒检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d88f/11348535/32d78f73f949/12879_2024_9770_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验