Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Biophys J. 2024 Oct 1;123(19):3452-3462. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.08.019. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
Researchers choose different methods of making giant unilamellar vesicles to satisfy different constraints of their experimental designs. A challenge that arises when researchers use a variety of methods is that each method may produce vesicles with a different average lipid ratio, even if all experiments use lipids from a common stock mixture. Here, we use mass spectrometry to investigate ratios of lipids in vesicle solutions made by five common methods: electroformation on indium tin oxide slides, electroformation on platinum wires, gentle hydration, emulsion transfer, and extrusion. We made vesicles from either five-component or binary mixtures of lipids chosen to span a wide range of physical properties: di(18:1)PC, di(16:0)PC, di(18:1)PG, di(12:0)PE, and cholesterol. For a mixture of all five of these lipids, ITO electroformation, Pt electroformation, gentle hydration, and extrusion methods result in only minor shifts in lipid ratios (≤5 mol %) relative to a common stock solution. In contrast, emulsion transfer results in ∼80% less cholesterol than expected from the stock solution, which is counterbalanced by a surprising overabundance of saturated PC-lipid relative to all other phospholipids. Experiments using binary mixtures of saturated and unsaturated PC-lipids and cholesterol largely support results from the five-component mixture. In general, our results imply that experiments that increment lipid ratios in small steps will produce data that are highly sensitive to the technique used and to sample-to-sample variations. For example, sample-to-sample variations are ∼±2 mol % for five-component vesicles produced by a single technique. In contrast, experiments that explore larger increments in lipid ratio or that seek to explain general trends and new phenomena will be less sensitive to sample-to-sample variation and the method used.
研究人员选择不同的方法来制备大单室囊泡,以满足其实验设计的不同限制。当研究人员使用各种方法时,会出现一个挑战,即即使所有实验都使用来自共同储备混合物的脂质,每种方法都可能产生具有不同平均脂质比的囊泡。在这里,我们使用质谱法研究了通过五种常见方法制备的囊泡溶液中的脂质比例:在铟锡氧化物(ITO)玻片上电成形、在铂丝上电成形、温和水合、乳液转移和挤出。我们用选择的跨越广泛物理性质范围的五种或两种脂质混合物来制备囊泡:二硬脂酰基磷脂酰胆碱(di(18:1)PC)、二棕榈酰基磷脂酰胆碱(di(16:0)PC)、二硬脂酰基磷脂酰甘油(di(18:1)PG)、二硬脂酰基磷脂酰乙醇胺(di(12:0)PE)和胆固醇。对于所有这五种脂质的混合物,ITO 电成形、Pt 电成形、温和水合和挤出方法相对于共同储备溶液仅导致脂质比例发生较小的变化(≤5 mol%)。相比之下,乳液转移导致的胆固醇比储备溶液中预期的少约 80%,这被所有其他磷脂相对于饱和 PC 脂质的惊人过剩所平衡。使用饱和和不饱和 PC 脂质和胆固醇的二元混合物的实验在很大程度上支持了五组分混合物的结果。总的来说,我们的结果表明,以小步递增脂质比例的实验将产生对所用技术和样品间变化高度敏感的数据。例如,通过单一技术制备的五组分囊泡的样品间变化约为±2 mol%。相比之下,探索脂质比例较大增量或试图解释一般趋势和新现象的实验对样品间变化和所用方法的敏感性较低。