Suppr超能文献

医师费用表并非为高成本耗材和设备而制定。

The Physician Fee Schedule Was Not Built for High-Cost Supplies and Equipment.

作者信息

Rasmussen David, Yalamanchili Amulya, Tahara Bob, Niedzwiecki Gerald A, McKitrick Jason, Thomas Tarita O

机构信息

Vascular Surgery, The Vascular Care Group, Burlington, USA.

Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):e67931. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67931. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

As reimbursement from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) continues to decline, cuts to practice expense relative value units disproportionately impact office-based interventionalists and private practices that rely on high-cost equipment. For 195 codes, specialties such as radiation oncology, vascular surgery, and interventional radiology are paid at rates less than their direct costs calculated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services itself. While reimbursement in the office-based setting continues to decline, high-cost hospital settings receive more payment for the same services. This disparity aligns with trends in care moving to the hospital setting and practice consolidation, resulting in increased costs to the healthcare system and decreased access to care. The current PFS is outdated, and the removal of high-cost supplies and equipment from the PFS is a critical step to reform.

摘要

随着医疗保险医师费率表(PFS)的报销金额持续下降,实践费用相对价值单位的削减对依赖高成本设备的门诊介入医生和私人诊所产生了不成比例的影响。对于195个代码,放射肿瘤学、血管外科和介入放射学等专科的支付费率低于医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心自己计算的直接成本。虽然门诊环境中的报销金额持续下降,但相同服务在高成本的医院环境中却获得了更多支付。这种差异与医疗服务向医院环境转移和实践合并的趋势一致,导致医疗系统成本增加,医疗服务可及性下降。当前的PFS已经过时,从PFS中去除高成本耗材和设备是改革的关键一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a7/11349034/0825cd0a191e/cureus-0016-00000067931-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验