Schmitt Viviane, Baeumler Petra, Schänzer Anne, Irnich Dominik, Schoser Benedikt, Montagnese Federica
Friedrich-Baur-Institut, Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Department of Anesthesiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 13;15:1414140. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1414140. eCollection 2024.
Chronic muscle pain is common in myotonic dystrophies (DM). Little is known about its pathophysiology. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of the neuropathic pain component contributing contributes to the pathogenesis of chronic pain in DM.
Twenty-one DM1 and 32 DM2 patients completed pain questionnaires (Brief pain inventory-BPI, PAIN-DETECT, pain disability index-PDI) and underwent neurological examination, nerve conduction studies (NCS), quantitative sensory testing (QST, dorsum of the right hand and right thigh) and skin biopsy to determine the intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD, distal and proximal site of lower extremity). NCS and QST results at the thigh were compared to 27 healthy controls and IENFD and QST at the dorsum of the hand to published reference values.
The sensory profile of DM2 patients was characterized by a loss in thermal and mechanical detection, while DM1 patients showed reduced mechanical and heat pain thresholds and higher mechanical pain sensitivity. Both DM groups showed pressure hyperalgesia. IENFD was reduced in 63% of DM1 patients and 50% of DM2. The slightly higher pain interference and disability found in DM2 was rather due to age difference than disease.
Similar pain mechanisms likely occur in both DM1 and DM2, even though a tendency toward more pain sensitivity was observed in DM1 and more sensory loss in DM2. Both QST and reduced IENFD highlight the presence of peripheral nerve damage in DM. This must be considered for the best pain management strategies.
慢性肌肉疼痛在强直性肌营养不良症(DM)中很常见。其病理生理学知之甚少。我们旨在研究神经性疼痛成分在DM慢性疼痛发病机制中的特征。
21例DM1患者和32例DM2患者完成了疼痛问卷(简明疼痛量表-BPI、疼痛检测量表、疼痛残疾指数-PDI),并接受了神经学检查、神经传导研究(NCS)、定量感觉测试(QST,右手背和右大腿)以及皮肤活检,以确定表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFD,下肢远端和近端部位)。将大腿的NCS和QST结果与27名健康对照者进行比较,将手背的IENFD和QST结果与已发表的参考值进行比较。
DM2患者的感觉特征表现为热觉和机械觉检测丧失,而DM1患者表现为机械性和热痛阈值降低以及机械性疼痛敏感性增加。两个DM组均表现出压痛过敏。63%的DM1患者和50%的DM2患者IENFD降低。DM2患者中疼痛干扰和残疾略高更多是由于年龄差异而非疾病本身。
DM1和DM2可能存在相似的疼痛机制,尽管观察到DM1有更明显的疼痛敏感性倾向,DM2有更多的感觉丧失。QST和降低的IENFD均突出了DM中存在周围神经损伤。在制定最佳疼痛管理策略时必须考虑这一点。