Gruneberg Daniel, Dietrich Maximilian, Studier-Fischer Alexander, Petersen Clara, von der Forst Maik, Özdemir Berkin, Schöchl Herbert, Nickel Felix, Weigand Markus A, Schmitt Felix C F
Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of General, Visceral, and Trasplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Aug 13;12:1417847. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1417847. eCollection 2024.
Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHA) are integral in contemporary hemostatic resuscitation, offering insights into clot formation, firmness, and lysis for rapid diagnosis and targeted therapy. Large animal models, particularly swine, provide anatomical and physiological analogies for coagulation research. Despite the growing use of VHAs, the ClotPro device's applicability in porcine models remains unexplored. This study investigates ClotPro in a porcine model of abdominal surgery, severe hemorrhage, and resuscitation, comparing it with the established ROTEM delta system.
Twenty-seven healthy pigs underwent abdominal surgery, hemorrhage and resuscitation. ClotPro and ROTEM were used to assess viscoelastic hemostatic properties at baseline, after surgery, 60 min after shock induction, 60 and 120 min after resuscitation.
Clotting times in extrinsically and intrinsically stimulated assays exhibited fair to moderate correlation. Clot firmness in extrinsically stimulated tests could be used interchangeably while fibrin polymerization assays revealed significant differences between the devices. Fibrin polymerization assays in ClotPro consistently yielded higher values than ROTEM. Furthermore, the study evaluated the ClotPro TPA-test's applicability in porcine blood, revealing failure of lysis induction in porcine blood samples.
This research contributes valuable insights into the use of ClotPro in porcine models of hemorrhage and coagulopathy, highlighting both its applicability and limitations in comparison to ROTEM delta. The observed differences, especially in fibrin polymerization assays, emphasize the importance of understanding device-specific characteristics when interpreting results. Due to its inapplicability, TPA-test should not be used in porcine blood to evaluate fibrinolytic potential. The study provides a foundation for future investigations into the use of different viscoelastic hemostatic assays in porcine animal models.
粘弹性止血检测(VHA)在当代止血复苏中不可或缺,它能深入了解血凝块的形成、硬度和溶解情况,有助于快速诊断和靶向治疗。大型动物模型,尤其是猪,为凝血研究提供了解剖学和生理学上的相似性。尽管VHA的应用越来越广泛,但ClotPro设备在猪模型中的适用性仍未得到探索。本研究在猪腹部手术、严重出血和复苏模型中研究ClotPro,并将其与成熟的ROTEM delta系统进行比较。
27只健康猪接受腹部手术、出血和复苏。在基线、手术后、休克诱导后60分钟、复苏后60分钟和120分钟,使用ClotPro和ROTEM评估粘弹性止血特性。
外源性和内源性刺激检测中的凝血时间显示出中等程度的相关性。外源性刺激试验中的血凝块硬度可以互换使用,而纤维蛋白聚合试验显示两种设备之间存在显著差异。ClotPro中的纤维蛋白聚合试验结果始终高于ROTEM。此外,该研究评估了ClotPro组织纤溶酶原激活物(TPA)试验在猪血中的适用性,结果显示在猪血样本中无法诱导溶解。
本研究为ClotPro在猪出血和凝血病模型中的应用提供了有价值的见解,突出了其与ROTEM delta相比的适用性和局限性。观察到的差异,尤其是在纤维蛋白聚合试验中,强调了解释结果时了解设备特定特征的重要性。由于其不适用性,TPA试验不应在猪血中用于评估纤溶潜力。该研究为未来在猪动物模型中使用不同的粘弹性止血检测的研究奠定了基础。