• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制度逻辑与情感对宫颈癌筛查接受度的影响:来自莫桑比克赛赛的案例研究

The Influence of Institutional Logics and Emotions on the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening: A Case Study From Xai-Xai, Mozambique.

作者信息

Fulane Gefra, Major Maria, Lorenzoni Cesaltina, Munguambe Khatia

机构信息

Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health Serv Insights. 2024 Aug 27;17:11786329231224619. doi: 10.1177/11786329231224619. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1177/11786329231224619
PMID:39193550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11348342/
Abstract

This study investigates the role of emotional attachment to competing institutional logics on women's uptake of cervical cancer screening in Mozambique. Through a qualitative study conducted in Xai-Xai, Southern Mozambique, we identify 2 concurrent logics in the context of screening: preservation logic, influenced by social-cultural norms, and the prevention logic, centered around screening. Women, affected by emotions such as shame, fear, and marital subordination, often become attached to the preservation logic, which influences their values and contradicts acceptance of screening. However, some women with marital autonomy may reflect on both logics and gradually detach themselves from the preservation norms and show their intention to adopt life-saving behavior by accepting screening. It is through their emotions that women show their attachment to and detachment from competing logics, reinforcing traditional norms on the one hand, or giving them the means to adopt preventive measures on the other. The study indicates that cultural expectations, shame and the desire to preserve intimacy tie women to the logic of preservation and have a negative impact on participation in cervical cancer screening. Consequently, to improve screening uptake in Mozambique, the authorities need to adapt screening to socio-cultural and emotional factors, empower women, and effectively engage communities.

摘要

本研究调查了对相互竞争的制度逻辑的情感依恋在莫桑比克女性接受宫颈癌筛查方面所起的作用。通过在莫桑比克南部的赛赛进行的一项定性研究,我们在筛查背景下识别出两种并行的逻辑:受社会文化规范影响的保护逻辑,以及围绕筛查的预防逻辑。受羞耻、恐惧和婚姻从属等情绪影响的女性,往往会依恋保护逻辑,这会影响她们的价值观,并与接受筛查相矛盾。然而,一些拥有婚姻自主权的女性可能会对两种逻辑进行反思,并逐渐摆脱保护规范,通过接受筛查表现出采取挽救生命行为的意愿。正是通过她们的情感,女性表现出对相互竞争的逻辑的依恋和脱离,一方面强化了传统规范,另一方面为她们提供了采取预防措施的途径。该研究表明,文化期望、羞耻感以及维护亲密关系的愿望将女性与保护逻辑联系在一起,并对参与宫颈癌筛查产生负面影响。因此,为提高莫桑比克的筛查接受率,当局需要使筛查适应社会文化和情感因素,赋予女性权力,并有效地让社区参与进来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac86/11348342/37a668474926/10.1177_11786329231224619-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac86/11348342/37a668474926/10.1177_11786329231224619-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac86/11348342/37a668474926/10.1177_11786329231224619-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Influence of Institutional Logics and Emotions on the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening: A Case Study From Xai-Xai, Mozambique.制度逻辑与情感对宫颈癌筛查接受度的影响:来自莫桑比克赛赛的案例研究
Health Serv Insights. 2024 Aug 27;17:11786329231224619. doi: 10.1177/11786329231224619. eCollection 2024.
2
Knowledge about Cervical Cancer Prevention and Screening in Women with Cervical Cancer Attending Gynecological Services in Southern Mozambique.莫桑比克南部妇科服务就诊的宫颈癌女性对宫颈癌预防和筛查的认知。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 Nov 1;26(11):1616-1620. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_893_22. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
The Interactional-Institutional Construction of Teachers' Emotions in Hong Kong: The Inhabited Institutionalism Perspective.香港教师情感的互动—制度建构:栖居制度主义视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 26;10:2619. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02619. eCollection 2019.
4
'What matters to you?' Normative integration of an intervention to promote participation of older patients with multi-morbidity - a qualitative case study.“对你来说什么重要?”促进患有多种疾病的老年患者参与的干预措施的规范整合——一项定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06106-y.
5
Women's sexual autonomy as a determinant of cervical cancer screening uptake in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case-control study.女性性自主权对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴宫颈癌筛查参与度的影响:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01829-4.
6
Positioning the Work of Health Professions Education Scholarship Units: How Canadian Directors Harness Institutional Logics Within Institutional Orders to Convey Unit Legitimacy.定位健康专业教育学术单位的工作:加拿大主任如何在机构秩序内利用制度逻辑传达单位合法性。
Acad Med. 2019 Dec;94(12):1988-1994. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002817.
7
"There Are Things We Can Do and There Are Things We Cannot Do." A Qualitative Study About Women's Perceptions on Empowerment in Relation to Fertility Intentions and Family Planning Practices in Mozambique.“有些事我们能做,有些事我们做不了。” 一项关于莫桑比克女性对与生育意愿和计划生育实践相关的赋权认知的定性研究。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Mar 23;3:824650. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.824650. eCollection 2022.
8
The Interplay of Conflicting and Complementing Institutional Logics in Sustainability Practices.可持续发展实践中相互冲突与互补的制度逻辑之间的相互作用
Manag Int Rev. 2023;63(3):469-506. doi: 10.1007/s11575-023-00503-7. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
9
Social and cultural aspects of infertility in Mozambique.莫桑比克不孕症的社会和文化方面
Patient Educ Couns. 1997 May;31(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(97)01018-5.
10
Exploring the institutional logics of health professions education scholarship units.探究卫生职业教育学术单位的制度逻辑。
Med Educ. 2017 Jul;51(7):755-767. doi: 10.1111/medu.13334. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Oncology in Mozambique: Overview of the Diagnostic, Treatment, and Research Capacity.莫桑比克的肿瘤学:诊断、治疗及研究能力概述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 11;15(4):1163. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041163.
2
Cervical cancer screening uptake in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的宫颈癌筛查参与率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Public Health. 2021 Jun;195:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Cervical cancer screening uptake in women aged between 15 and 64 years in Mozambique.莫桑比克 15 至 64 岁女性的宫颈癌筛查参与度。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jul;28(4):338-343. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000459.
4
Perceptions of risk and barriers to cervical cancer screening at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya.肯尼亚埃尔多雷特市莫伊教学与转诊医院(MTRH)对宫颈癌筛查的风险认知及障碍
Afr Health Sci. 2011 Mar;11(1):58-64.
5
Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey.英格兰地区宫颈癌筛查参与障碍的研究:一项基于人群的调查。
J Med Screen. 2009;16(4):199-204. doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009073.
6
Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia.宫颈癌筛查的障碍:对塞尔维亚女性的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(12):2528-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jun 13.
7
Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America.拉丁美洲宫颈癌筛查的感知障碍和益处
Prev Med. 2004 Jul;39(1):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.040.
8
Breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women: a literature review using the health belief model.西班牙裔女性的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:基于健康信念模型的文献综述
Womens Health Issues. 2002 May-Jun;12(3):122-8. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(02)00132-9.