School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Sep-Oct;31(5):866-873. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2082875. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
Many social cognitive assessments that were developed specifically for use in clinical populations are now being widely used in undergraduate populations, either to provide a comparison for clinical groups or to explore performance across the continuum from healthy to subclinical populations. However, the appropriateness of using these assessments in the general population is unclear. The current study, therefore, seeks to determine whether the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) battery retains its psychometric properties when used in an undergraduate sample.The initial SCOPE battery was administered to 265 undergraduate participants, and the utility of the tasks was measured by assessing floor and ceiling effects. Internal consistency, discriminant and convergent validity are reported for each task, and the relationship between task performance and neurocognition and social functioning were assessed.Several of the tasks demonstrated limited utility, with the Hinting Task specifically demonstrating a pronounced ceiling effect. Only two measures of social cognitive biases achieved satisfactory internal consistency. Select tasks demonstrated small, but significant relationships with social functioning outcomes and significantly predicted 2-3% of variance above neurocognition alone.Despite the association with social functioning, results indicate that the psychometric properties demonstrated in the initial SCOPE study with a clinical sample do not fully extend to a healthy undergraduate population and highlight the need for social cognitive tasks that validly assess ability across the continuum.
许多专门为临床人群开发的社会认知评估工具现在也被广泛应用于本科生群体,无论是为了与临床群体进行比较,还是为了探索从健康人群到亚临床人群的连续体上的表现。然而,在一般人群中使用这些评估工具是否合适尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在确定社会认知心理计量评估(SCOPE)测试在本科生样本中是否保留其心理计量学特性。最初的 SCOPE 测试被用于 265 名本科生,通过评估地板效应和天花板效应来衡量任务的有效性。报告了每个任务的内部一致性、区分度和收敛效度,并评估了任务表现与神经认知和社会功能之间的关系。几项任务的有效性有限,提示任务特别表现出明显的天花板效应。只有两种社会认知偏差测量方法达到了令人满意的内部一致性。一些特定任务与社会功能结果呈小但显著的关系,并且显著预测了神经认知之外的 2-3%的方差。尽管与社会功能有关,但结果表明,在具有临床样本的初始 SCOPE 研究中表现出的心理计量学特性并不完全适用于健康的本科生群体,这突出了需要能够在整个连续体上有效评估能力的社会认知任务。