Livas Christos, Delli Konstantina
Angle Orthod. 2025 Jan 1;95(1):96-103. doi: 10.2319/060124-426.1.
To investigate the current state of article usage metrics in orthodontics.
Out of all orthodontic journals listed in Journal Citation Reports 2022, the European Journal of Orthodontics and The Angle Orthodontist fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All journal issues published in 2021 were scrutinized for original research articles and systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and the following features were collected: article type, subject, title, number of words and authors, Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), X (formerly Twitter) posts, and Mendeley reads. Article citations, number of publications, and h-index of the last authors were retrieved from Web of Science (WoS).
181 articles were considered eligible. The median number of views and downloads of included articles was 1296 (range: 355-10,233) and 793 (range: 167-3629). Page views, downloads, and total views were significantly correlated with WoS citations (rho > 0.345; P < .001). There was no correlation between usage metrics, AAS, X posts, and Mendeley reads. Number of downloads were significantly higher in studies dealing with new technologies, and where the last author had 1-40 publications or an h-index of 0-30.
Page views, downloads, and total views were positively correlated with WoS citations and, therefore, may serve as an early estimate of future citations. Significant variations in article downloads may be expected in relation to article subject, scientific productivity, and impact of the last authors.
调查正畸学领域文章使用指标的现状。
在《期刊引证报告2022》中列出的所有正畸学杂志中,《欧洲正畸学杂志》和《安格尔正畸学家》符合纳入标准。对2021年出版的所有期刊进行审查,以查找原创研究文章和系统评价/荟萃分析,并收集以下特征:文章类型、主题、标题、字数和作者数量、Altmetric关注度得分(AAS)、X(原推特)帖子数量以及Mendeley阅读量。文章引用次数、出版物数量以及最后一位作者的h指数从科学网(WoS)中检索。
181篇文章被认为符合条件。纳入文章的浏览量和下载量中位数分别为1296次(范围:355 - 10233次)和793次(范围:167 - 3629次)。页面浏览量、下载量和总浏览量与WoS引用次数显著相关(rho > 0.345;P < .001)。使用指标、AAS、X帖子数量和Mendeley阅读量之间没有相关性。涉及新技术的研究以及最后一位作者有1 - 40篇出版物或h指数为0 - 30的研究,其下载量显著更高。
页面浏览量、下载量和总浏览量与WoS引用次数呈正相关,因此可作为未来引用次数的早期估计。文章下载量可能会因文章主题、科研生产力以及最后一位作者的影响力而出现显著差异。