在欧洲正畸学会大会上进行的口头演讲能传播多远？比较摘要发表率、文章引用率和社交媒体提及率。

How far do oral lectures at European Orthodontic Society congresses reach? A comparison of abstract publication rates, article citations, and social media mentions.

机构信息

Division of Orthodontics, Dental Clinics Zwolle, Stationsweg 5, 8011 CZ, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2024 Dec 1;46(6). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae057.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjae057

PMID:39449615

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the scientific impact of oral abstracts presented in five consecutive European Orthodontic Society (EOS) congresses in terms of full-text publication rates as well as citations and social media metrics (altmetrics) of the resulting articles.

METHODS

PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) and Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.nl/) were screened to identify published articles originally presented as lectures at EOS 2015-2019. EOS date, abstract title, subject, number of authors, authors' names, first author's country of origin, and type of affiliation were extracted from congress abstract books. Altmetric Attention Scores (AASs), number of X (formerly Twitter) posts, Mendeley reads, and citations of the articles were retrieved from Altmetric Explorer and Web of Science (WoS) databases, respectively. Abstract details, full publication rates and Altmetric mentions and WoS citations of the related articles were analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 51.79 to 73.91% of the lectures presented at EOS 2015-2019 were converted into peer-reviewed articles. There was a median interval of 10.95 months (interquartile range 20.5 months) between conference and publication dates. EOS congress year (overall Wald test P-value = .04) and number of authors (overall Wald test P-value < .01) were significant predictors for full-text publication of oral lectures. There was no significant effect of EOS presentation on AASs, citations, X posts, and Mendeley readers (P > .05).

LIMITATIONS

Journal impact factors and quartile rankings were not considered to determine the impact of the journals that published articles originally presented as EOS oral abstracts.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 61.30% of EOS 2015-2019 lectures were published as full-length articles. Multi-authored abstracts presented higher odds of publication, whereas oral abstracts presented at EOS 2015 and 2018 had the lowest probabilities to reach full publication. EOS abstract-based articles were assigned similar numbers of citations and AASs to articles not presented at EOS congresses.

摘要

目的

本研究以全文发表率、引文以及文章相关的社交媒体指标（altmetrics）为指标，调查了在连续五届欧洲正畸学会（EOS）大会上报告的口腔摘要的科学影响力。

方法

在 PubMed（http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed）和 Google Scholar（http://scholar.google.nl/）上进行筛选，以确定发表的原始文章最初是在 2015-2019 年的 EOS 大会上作为演讲报告的。从大会摘要书籍中提取 EOS 日期、摘要标题、主题、作者人数、作者姓名、第一作者原籍国和所属机构类型。从 Altmetric Explorer 和 Web of Science（WoS）数据库中分别检索文章的 Altmetric 关注分数（AAS）、X（前 Twitter）帖子数、Mendeley 阅读量和引文。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析相关文章的摘要详细信息、全文发表率和 Altmetric 提及及 WoS 引文。

结果

在 2015-2019 年的 EOS 会议上，51.79%至 73.91%的演讲最终转化为同行评审文章。会议和出版日期之间的中位数间隔为 10.95 个月（四分位距为 20.5 个月）。EOS 大会年份（总体 Wald 检验 P 值=0.04）和作者人数（总体 Wald 检验 P 值<0.01）是口腔讲座全文发表的显著预测因素。EOS 报告对 AASs、引文、X 帖子和 Mendeley 读者没有显著影响（P>.05）。