• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同外科专业和手术入路的供肾切取术结局和成本。

Outcomes and Cost of Donor Nephrectomy Across Surgical Specialties and Operative Approaches.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

Urol Pract. 2024 Nov;11(6):921-929. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000673. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000673
PMID:39196727
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is performed by various specialty surgeons, including urologists, general surgeons, and transplant surgeons. However, national practice patterns and outcomes associated with surgeon specialty have not been previously explored. Here, we investigate surgeon specialty trends, perioperative complications, hospital length of stay, cost, and charge for LDN according to surgeon specialty.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LDN from 2000 to quarter 1 of 2020 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Associations between physician specialty and 3-month complications, hospital length of stay, institutional cost, and patient charge for LDN procedures were examined using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

We identified 11,418 patients who underwent LDN. Of these cases, 3387 (29.7%) were performed by urologists, 3127 (27.4%) by transplant surgeons, 3928 (34.4%) by general surgeons, and 976 (8.5%) by other specialties. In 2000, urologists performed 35.92% of LDNs, decreasing to 18.91% by 2019 ( < .001 for trend). In the last 5 years, we found no significant difference in complications or length of stay according to surgeon specialty. LDNs performed by a urologist ($57,289, 95% CI $49,292-$66,582) were associated with lower patient charges than those performed by a general surgeon ($68,501, 95% CI $59,090-$79,412) or transplant surgeon ($62,639, 95% CI $53,993-$72,670).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2000 to 2019, the proportion of LDNs performed by urologists significantly decreased, while the proportion for transplant surgeons significantly increased, with no significant differences in complications or length of stay across specialties. However, surgeries performed by urologists cost hospitals less and had lower charges for patients.

摘要

介绍

活体供肾切除术(LDN)由各种专业外科医生进行,包括泌尿科医生、普通外科医生和移植外科医生。然而,国家的实践模式和与外科医生专业相关的结果尚未得到探索。在这里,我们根据外科医生的专业研究外科医生专业趋势、围手术期并发症、住院时间、成本和 LDN 费用。

方法

在 Premier Healthcare Database 中确定了 2000 年至 2020 年第一季度期间接受 LDN 的患者。使用多变量回归检查医生专业与 3 个月并发症、住院时间、机构成本和 LDN 手术患者费用之间的关联。

结果

我们确定了 11418 例接受 LDN 的患者。这些病例中,3387 例(29.7%)由泌尿科医生完成,3127 例(27.4%)由移植外科医生完成,3928 例(34.4%)由普通外科医生完成,976 例(8.5%)由其他专业完成。2000 年,泌尿科医生进行了 35.92%的 LDN,到 2019 年下降到 18.91%(趋势差异<.001)。在过去的 5 年中,我们没有发现根据外科医生的专业LDN 的并发症或住院时间没有差异。泌尿科医生进行的 LDN(57289 美元,95%CI 49292-66582)与普通外科医生(68501 美元,95%CI 59090-79412)或移植外科医生(62639 美元,95%CI 53993-72670)进行的 LDN 相比,患者费用较低。

结论

从 2000 年到 2019 年,泌尿科医生进行的 LDN 比例显著下降,而移植外科医生进行的 LDN 比例显著增加,各专业之间的并发症或住院时间无显著差异。然而,泌尿科医生进行的手术为医院节省了成本,并且患者的费用也较低。

相似文献

1
Outcomes and Cost of Donor Nephrectomy Across Surgical Specialties and Operative Approaches.不同外科专业和手术入路的供肾切取术结局和成本。
Urol Pract. 2024 Nov;11(6):921-929. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000673. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
2
Implementation and learning of laproscopic donor nephrectomy by a non-transplant general surgeon with advanced laparoscopic skills.由一位具备先进腹腔镜技术的非移植普通外科医生实施和学习腹腔镜供肾切除术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Aug;4(3):127-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00092.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助与开放性肾切除术用于活体供肾者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006124.pub3.
4
Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: a single-center experience in Thailand.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术:与开放手术技术的比较以及如何达到质量标准:泰国单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2011 Dec;43(10):3593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.115.
5
Surgical team composition has a major impact on effectiveness and costs in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.手术团队的构成对腹腔镜供体肾切除术的效果和成本有重大影响。
World J Urol. 2015 May;33(5):733-41. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1428-9. Epub 2014 Nov 2.
6
A comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional procedures for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a Japanese multi-institutional retrospective study.腹腔镜单部位手术与传统腹腔镜供肾切除术的比较:日本多机构回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3424-3434. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07119-9. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
7
Evolution of Living Donor Nephrectomy at a Single Center: Long-term Outcomes With 4 Different Techniques in Greater Than 4000 Donors Over 50 Years.单中心活体供肾切除术的演变:50 多年来 4000 多例供体采用 4 种不同技术的长期结果。
Transplantation. 2016 Jun;100(6):1299-305. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001251.
8
Why potential live renal donors prefer laparoscopic nephrectomy: a survey of live donor attitudes.潜在活体肾供体为何更倾向于腹腔镜肾切除术:对活体供体态度的一项调查
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1344-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07126.x. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
9
Successful introduction of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy after experience with laparoscopic single-site plus-one trocar donor nephrectomy.在经历了腹腔镜单孔加一针Trocar供肾切除术之后,成功引入了腹腔镜单孔供肾切除术。
J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):435-42. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0509. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
10
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a single institution.单中心腹腔镜下单部位手术(LESS)与传统腹腔镜供肾切术的比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):198-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11763.x. Epub 2013 Mar 11.