Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, OH.
College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Nov 4;33(6):3082-3099. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00025. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Voice and swallowing are distinct functions that share anatomical and physiological properties; however, research investigating their intersection is limited. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the literature surrounding the relationship between voice and swallowing measures in healthy adults and those with non-degenerative disorders. Specifically, we aimed to elucidate whether objective voice measures could be used as correlates of swallowing function.
We systematically searched four databases (Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science) for relevant literature using a combination of key words and controlled vocabulary generated from the Yale Mesh Analyzer. The inclusion criteria consisted of peer-reviewed studies in the English language that reported on healthy adults and/or patients with non-degenerative neurological disorders and pulmonary diseases and contained instrumental and/or objective voice and swallowing measures. Two raters completed the abstract screening process followed by independent full-text reviews. Case studies, review studies, gray literature, or abstract-only studies were excluded.
Among 5,485 screened studies, 182 were fully reviewed, with only 11 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Eight studies found an association between voice and swallowing objective measures, whereas the other three did not. Significant voice measures that were related to swallowing safety and/or physiology included maximum fundamental frequency (0), 0 range, maximum phonation time, biomechanics of effortful pitch glides, and voice onset time.
Although there was heterogeneity in the measures used, specific objective voice measures showed promise in clinical practice as a screening tool for dysphagia. Further investigations are needed to validate the clinical utility of these measures across diverse patient populations.
声音和吞咽是两个不同的功能,它们具有解剖学和生理学上的共同属性;然而,研究它们之间关系的文献有限。本综述的目的是探讨健康成年人和非退行性疾病患者的声音和吞咽测量之间关系的文献。具体而言,我们旨在阐明客观的声音测量是否可以作为吞咽功能的相关指标。
我们使用耶鲁网分析器生成的关键词和受控词汇,系统地在四个数据库(Embase、PubMed、CINAHL 和 Web of Science)中搜索相关文献。纳入标准包括使用仪器和/或客观的声音和吞咽测量方法,报告健康成年人和/或非退行性神经疾病和肺部疾病患者的同行评审研究。两名评估员完成了摘要筛选过程,然后进行了独立的全文审查。排除病例研究、综述研究、灰色文献或仅摘要研究。
在筛选的 5485 篇研究中,有 182 篇进行了全面审查,只有 11 篇符合纳入标准。八项研究发现声音和吞咽客观测量之间存在关联,而另外三项研究则没有。与吞咽安全性和/或生理学相关的显著声音测量指标包括最大基频(F0)、F0 范围、最长发音时间、用力音高滑行的生物力学和语音起始时间。
尽管所使用的测量指标存在异质性,但特定的客观声音测量指标在吞咽障碍的临床实践中作为一种筛查工具具有一定的前景。需要进一步的研究来验证这些指标在不同患者群体中的临床实用性。