Suppr超能文献

探究性混合方法分析影响学生对 STEM 入门课程包容性认知的因素。

An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Analysis of Factors Contributing to Students' Perceptions of Inclusion in Introductory STEM Courses.

机构信息

Center for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.

Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar40. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-04-0055.

Abstract

In this exploratory mixed-methods analysis of students' perceptions of inclusion in introductory STEM courses for STEM majors, we asked students to rate inclusion in their class and to provide an open-text explanation of their rating. Analyzing 1930 qualitative responses resulted in a codebook containing academic, identity, and nonspecific categories. The majority of responses (>80%) cited academic factors such as interactions between students and instructors or course elements and policies. Most academic responses aligned with evidence-based teaching practices fostering inclusion, describing a range of strategies and policies instructors can implement to increase students' perceptions of inclusion. A small number of student responses indicated that their perception of the required knowledge background for the course impacted course inclusivity. Few differences in frequency distributions were found between subgroups examined (gender, race and ethnicity, self-reported inclusion score, and discipline). Additionally, tracking a subset of students (135) across three courses revealed that most (80%) cited different factors influencing their perception of inclusion in each course. This suggests students' perceptions of inclusive practices are complex, and most students recognize multiple factors that influence their inclusion. Overall, our findings suggest instructors can significantly influence students' perceptions of inclusion by using multiple inclusive teaching strategies and course policies.

摘要

在这项针对 STEM 专业学生对 STEM 专业入门课程包容性感知的探索性混合方法分析中,我们要求学生对他们所在班级的包容性进行评分,并对他们的评分进行开放式文本解释。对 1930 份定性回复进行分析后,得出了一个包含学术、身份和非特定类别的编码本。大多数回复(>80%)提到了学术因素,例如学生和教师之间的互动或课程元素和政策。大多数学术回复与支持包容的循证教学实践一致,描述了一系列教师可以实施的策略和政策,以提高学生对包容性的感知。少数学生的回复表明,他们对课程所需知识背景的看法影响了课程的包容性。在研究的亚组(性别、种族和民族、自我报告的包容性得分和学科)之间,发现频率分布的差异很小。此外,对三个课程中的一组学生(135 名)进行跟踪发现,大多数(80%)学生在每门课程中都引用了不同的因素来影响他们对包容性的看法。这表明学生对包容性实践的看法是复杂的,大多数学生认识到影响他们包容性的多个因素。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,教师可以通过使用多种包容性教学策略和课程政策,显著影响学生对包容性的看法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4c/11440732/e9ed6b91022e/cbe-23-ar40-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验