• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光学相干断层扫描预测支架植入术后的临床结局:ILUMIEN IV 试验。

Optical coherence tomography predictors of clinical outcomes after stent implantation: the ILUMIEN IV trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Charité, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2024 Nov 14;45(43):4630-4643. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae521.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae521
PMID:39196989
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11560276/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Observational registries have suggested that optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging-derived parameters may predict adverse events after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The present analysis sought to determine the OCT predictors of clinical outcomes from the large-scale ILUMIEN IV trial.

METHODS

ILUMIEN IV was a prospective, single-blind trial of 2487 patients with diabetes or high-risk lesions randomized to OCT-guided versus angiography-guided DES implantation. All patients underwent final OCT imaging (blinded in the angiography-guided arm). From more than 20 candidates, the independent OCT predictors of 2-year target lesion failure (TLF; the primary endpoint), cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), and stent thrombosis were analysed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression in single treated lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 2128 patients had a single treated lesion with core laboratory-analysed final OCT. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier rates of TLF, cardiac death or TV-MI, ID-TLR, and stent thrombosis were 6.3% (n = 130), 3.3% (n = 68), 4.3% (n = 87), and 0.9% (n = 18), respectively. The independent predictors of 2-year TLF were a smaller minimal stent area (per 1 mm2 increase: hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.89, P < .0001) and proximal edge dissection (hazard ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.20-2.62, P = .004). The independent predictors of cardiac death or TV-MI were smaller minimal stent area and longer stent length; of ID-TLR were smaller intra-stent flow area and proximal edge dissection; and of stent thrombosis was smaller minimal stent expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

In the ILUMIEN IV trial, the most important OCT-derived post-DES predictors of both safety and effectiveness outcomes were parameters related to stent area, expansion and flow, proximal edge dissection, and stent length.

摘要

背景和目的

观察性注册研究表明,光学相干断层扫描(OCT)成像衍生的参数可能预测药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后的不良事件。本分析旨在确定来自大规模 ILUMIEN IV 试验的 OCT 预测临床结局的指标。

方法

ILUMIEN IV 是一项前瞻性、单盲试验,共纳入 2487 例糖尿病或高危病变患者,随机分为 OCT 指导与血管造影指导的 DES 植入组。所有患者均接受最终 OCT 成像(血管造影指导组盲法)。从 20 多个候选参数中,通过多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析,在单支病变中分析了 2 年靶病变失败(TLF;主要终点)、心脏死亡或靶血管心肌梗死(TV-MI)、缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建(ID-TLR)和支架血栓形成的独立 OCT 预测因素。

结果

共 2128 例患者的单支病变进行了核心实验室分析的最终 OCT。2 年Kaplan-Meier 发生率为 TLF、心脏死亡或 TV-MI、ID-TLR 和支架血栓形成分别为 6.3%(n=130)、3.3%(n=68)、4.3%(n=87)和 0.9%(n=18)。2 年 TLF 的独立预测因素为最小支架面积较小(每增加 1mm2:风险比 0.76,95%置信区间 0.68-0.89,P<0.0001)和近端边缘夹层(风险比 1.77,95%置信区间 1.20-2.62,P=0.004)。心脏死亡或 TV-MI 的独立预测因素为最小支架面积和支架长度较长;ID-TLR 的独立预测因素为支架内血流面积较小和近端边缘夹层;支架血栓形成的独立预测因素为最小支架扩张。

结论

在 ILUMIEN IV 试验中,DES 后最重要的与安全性和有效性结果相关的 OCT 衍生预测因素是与支架面积、扩张和血流、近端边缘夹层和支架长度相关的参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a48/11560276/7ca02395c0d8/ehae521f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a48/11560276/33a904e54336/ehae521_sga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a48/11560276/056fd3129023/ehae521f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a48/11560276/7ca02395c0d8/ehae521f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a48/11560276/33a904e54336/ehae521_sga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a48/11560276/056fd3129023/ehae521f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a48/11560276/7ca02395c0d8/ehae521f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Optical coherence tomography predictors of clinical outcomes after stent implantation: the ILUMIEN IV trial.光学相干断层扫描预测支架植入术后的临床结局:ILUMIEN IV 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Nov 14;45(43):4630-4643. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae521.
2
OCT-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation in Complex Lesions: An ILUMIEN IV Substudy.OCT 指导与血管造影指导下复杂病变冠状动脉支架植入术:ILUMIEN IV 亚研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 23;84(4):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.037. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).光学相干断层成像指导支架扩张与血管内超声的比较:ILUMIEN II 研究(血流储备分数 [FFR] 和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的光学相干断层成像 [OCT] 观察性研究)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.024.
4
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声和血管造影指导冠状动脉支架置入术的比较(ILUMIEN III:OPTIMIZE PCI):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
5
Optical coherence tomography-guided coronary stent implantation compared to angiography: a multicentre randomised trial in PCI - design and rationale of ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI.光学相干断层扫描引导下的冠状动脉支架置入术与血管造影比较:PCI 中的一项多中心随机试验 - ILUMIEN IV:优化 PCI 的设计和原理。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jan 20;16(13):1092-1099. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00501.
6
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1466-1476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305861. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
7
Clinical impact of OCT-derived suboptimal stent implantation parameters and definitions.OCT 衍生的支架植入参数和定义的临床影响。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec 21;25(1):48-57. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead172.
8
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).SPIRIT III 试验的 5 年随机对照研究结果:依维莫司洗脱 XIENCE V 支架与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架的比较——治疗初发的 native 冠状动脉病变患者的 XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
9
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死患者的比较。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Aug;77(8):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.11.014. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
10
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with complex lesions (OCCUPI): an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial in South Korea.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂病变患者(OCCUPI):韩国一项由研究者发起的、多中心、随机、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 14;404(10457):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01454-5. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography: Technological Innovations and Clinical Implications in Cardiology.冠状动脉内光学相干断层扫描:心脏病学中的技术创新与临床意义
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2025;27(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11936-025-01103-4. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Association between post-PCI vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings: Results from the FAST OCT study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后血管血流储备分数(vFFR)与光学相干断层扫描(OCT)结果之间的关联:FAST OCT研究结果
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Jun 21;59:101706. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101706. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1466-1476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305861. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
2
Clinical impact of OCT-derived suboptimal stent implantation parameters and definitions.OCT 衍生的支架植入参数和定义的临床影响。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec 21;25(1):48-57. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead172.
3
Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention.光学相干断层成像在冠状动脉粥样硬化评估和干预中的应用。
Optical theranostics in ischemic heart disease: from molecular insights to clinical translation.
缺血性心脏病中的光学诊疗:从分子洞察到临床转化
Theranostics. 2025 Jun 9;15(14):6789-6817. doi: 10.7150/thno.114307. eCollection 2025.
4
Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.血管内成像引导与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 6;15(9):1175. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091175.
5
OCT vs Angiography for Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Calcified Lesions: The CALIPSO Randomized Clinical Trial.光学相干断层扫描与血管造影术用于指导钙化病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:CALIPSO随机临床试验
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0741.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Oct;19(10):684-703. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00687-9. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Clinical Implications of Poststent Optical Coherence Tomographic Findings: Severe Malapposition and Cardiac Events.支架置入术后光学相干断层扫描结果的临床意义:严重贴壁不良与心脏事件
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jan;15(1):126-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Optical coherence tomography-guided coronary stent implantation compared to angiography: a multicentre randomised trial in PCI - design and rationale of ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI.光学相干断层扫描引导下的冠状动脉支架置入术与血管造影比较:PCI 中的一项多中心随机试验 - ILUMIEN IV:优化 PCI 的设计和原理。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jan 20;16(13):1092-1099. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00501.
6
Predictors for Clinical Outcome of Untreated Stent Edge Dissections as Detected by Optical Coherence Tomography.光学相干断层扫描检测到的未经治疗的支架边缘夹层临床结局的预测因素
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar;13(3):e008685. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008685. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Impact of post-procedural minimal stent area on 2-year clinical outcomes in the SYNTAX II trial.SYNTAX II 试验中术后最小支架面积对 2 年临床结局的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 1;93(4):E225-E234. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28105. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
8
Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions.冠状动脉内影像学的临床应用。第 1 部分:冠状动脉介入治疗的指导和优化。欧洲经皮心血管介入治疗协会的专家共识文件。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 14;39(35):3281-3300. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy285.
9
Long-term consequences of optical coherence tomography findings during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro Per La Lotta Contro L'infarto - Optimization Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) LATE study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中光学相干断层成像结果的长期后果:Centro Per La Lotta Contro L'infarto - 优化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CLI-OPCI)延迟研究。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jul 20;14(4):e443-e451. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01111.
10
IVUS-Guided Versus OCT-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation: A Critical Appraisal.血管内超声指导与光学相干断层成像指导冠状动脉支架置入术:批判性评价。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec;10(12):1487-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.008.