• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OCT 指导与血管造影指导下复杂病变冠状动脉支架植入术:ILUMIEN IV 亚研究。

OCT-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation in Complex Lesions: An ILUMIEN IV Substudy.

机构信息

St Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, New York, USA; Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA; New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, New York, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Charité, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 23;84(4):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.037. Epub 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.037
PMID:38759907
Abstract

BACKGROUND

ILUMIEN IV was the first large-scale, multicenter, randomized trial comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided vs angiography-guided stent implantation in patients with high-risk clinical characteristics and/or complex angiographic lesions.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to specifically examine outcomes in the complex angiographic lesions subgroup.

METHODS

From the original trial population (N = 2,487), high-risk patients without complex angiographic lesions were excluded (n = 514). Complex angiographic lesion characteristics included: 1) long or multiple lesions with intended total stent length ≥28 mm; 2) bifurcation lesion with intended 2-stent strategy; 3) severely calcified lesion; 4) chronic total occlusion; or 5) in-stent restenosis. The study endpoints were: 1) final minimal stent area (MSA); 2) 2-year composite of serious major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction [MI], or stent thrombosis); and 3) 2-year effectiveness, defined as target-vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

The postpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) MSA was larger in the OCT-guided (n = 992) vs angiography-guided (n = 981) group (5.56 ± 1.95 mm vs 5.26 ± 1.81 mm; difference, 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14-0.47; P < 0.001). Compared with angiography-guided PCI, OCT-guided PCI resulted in a lower risk of serious MACE (3.1% vs 4.9%; HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40-0.99; P = 0.04). TVF was not significantly different between groups (7.3% vs 8.8%; HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59-1.12; P = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

In complex angiographic lesions, OCT-guided PCI led to a larger MSA and reduced the serious MACE, the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, or stent thrombosis, compared with angiography-guided PCI at 2 years, but did not significantly improve TVF. (Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Coronary Stent Implantation Compared to Angiography: A Multicenter Randomized Trial in PCI; NCT03507777).

摘要

背景

ILUMIEN IV 是第一项比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)指导与血管造影指导支架植入治疗高危临床特征和/或复杂血管病变患者的大规模、多中心、随机试验。

目的

作者旨在专门研究复杂血管病变亚组的结果。

方法

从原始试验人群(N=2487)中,排除无复杂血管病变的高危患者(n=514)。复杂血管病变特征包括:1)预期总支架长度≥28mm 的长或多病变;2)打算采用双支架策略的分叉病变;3)严重钙化病变;4)慢性完全闭塞;或 5)支架内再狭窄。研究终点为:1)最终最小支架面积(MSA);2)2 年严重主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(心脏死亡、靶血管心肌梗死[MI]或支架血栓形成)的复合终点;和 3)2 年有效性,定义为靶血管失败(TVF),即心脏死亡、靶血管 MI 或缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建的复合终点。

结果

在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,OCT 指导组(n=992)的 MSA 大于血管造影指导组(n=981)(5.56±1.95mm 比 5.26±1.81mm;差值,0.30;95%置信区间:0.14-0.47;P<0.001)。与血管造影指导 PCI 相比,OCT 指导 PCI 导致严重 MACE 的风险降低(3.1%比 4.9%;HR:0.63;95%置信区间:0.40-0.99;P=0.04)。两组之间 TVF 无显著差异(7.3%比 8.8%;HR:0.82;95%置信区间:0.59-1.12;P=0.20)。

结论

在复杂的血管病变中,与血管造影指导 PCI 相比,OCT 指导 PCI 在 2 年内可导致更大的 MSA 和降低严重 MACE(心脏死亡、靶血管 MI 或支架血栓形成的复合终点),但并未显著改善 TVF。(光学相干断层扫描指导的冠状动脉支架置入与血管造影比较:一项多中心随机临床试验;NCT03507777)。

相似文献

1
OCT-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation in Complex Lesions: An ILUMIEN IV Substudy.OCT 指导与血管造影指导下复杂病变冠状动脉支架植入术:ILUMIEN IV 亚研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 23;84(4):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.037. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声和血管造影指导冠状动脉支架置入术的比较(ILUMIEN III:OPTIMIZE PCI):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
3
Optical coherence tomography-guided coronary stent implantation compared to angiography: a multicentre randomised trial in PCI - design and rationale of ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI.光学相干断层扫描引导下的冠状动脉支架置入术与血管造影比较:PCI 中的一项多中心随机试验 - ILUMIEN IV:优化 PCI 的设计和原理。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jan 20;16(13):1092-1099. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00501.
4
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1466-1476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305861. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
5
Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound.光学相干断层成像术或血管内超声引导下的复杂冠状动脉病变介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan 23;83(3):401-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.017. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
6
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with complex lesions (OCCUPI): an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial in South Korea.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂病变患者(OCCUPI):韩国一项由研究者发起的、多中心、随机、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 14;404(10457):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01454-5. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
7
Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.光学相干断层扫描与血管造影及血管内超声在指导冠状动脉支架植入中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100 Suppl 1:S44-S56. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30416. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
8
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
9
Outcomes of optical coherence tomography guided percutaneous coronary intervention against angiography guided in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic reviews and meta-analyses.光学相干断层扫描引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与血管造影引导治疗冠心病患者的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian Heart J. 2023 Mar-Apr;75(2):108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
10
Clinical Significance of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis Within Drug-Eluting Stents: Impact on Patient Outcomes.光学相干断层成像引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的临床意义:对患者结局的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e033954. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033954. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂冠状动脉病变:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;15(15):1907. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151907.
2
Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography: Technological Innovations and Clinical Implications in Cardiology.冠状动脉内光学相干断层扫描:心脏病学中的技术创新与临床意义
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2025;27(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11936-025-01103-4. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
3
Latest Evidence on Intravascular Imaging: A Literature Review.
血管内成像的最新证据:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 3;14(13):4714. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134714.
4
Optical theranostics in ischemic heart disease: from molecular insights to clinical translation.缺血性心脏病中的光学诊疗:从分子洞察到临床转化
Theranostics. 2025 Jun 9;15(14):6789-6817. doi: 10.7150/thno.114307. eCollection 2025.
5
The "Mushroom Sign": An Interesting Case Report of Extreme Stent Malapposition.“蘑菇征”:一例极端支架贴壁不良的有趣病例报告
JACC Case Rep. 2025 Jun 11;30(14):103677. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.103677.
6
Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial.光学相干断层扫描与血管造影引导下钙化病变冠状动脉支架植入术:ILUMIEN IV试验
Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 21;46(32):3201-3210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf331.
7
Validation of complex PCI criteria in drug-coated balloon angioplasty.药物涂层球囊血管成形术中复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗标准的验证
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02664-x.
8
Intracoronary imaging: routine precision or reserve for complexity?冠状动脉内成像:常规操作的精准性还是复杂病例的备用手段?
EuroIntervention. 2025 Feb 3;21(3):e145-e146. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00069.
9
Outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention according to lesion complexity.根据病变复杂性的血管内成像引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
EuroIntervention. 2025 Feb 3;21(3):e171-e182. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00755.
10
Coronary angiography: a review of the state of the art and the evolution of angiography in cardio therapeutics.冠状动脉造影术:心血管治疗领域的技术现状及血管造影术的发展综述。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 25;11:1468888. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1468888. eCollection 2024.