Suppr超能文献

职业足球运动员起始组与非起始组每周内外训练负荷的比较分析:回顾性 21 周研究

A comparative analysis of weekly internal and external workloads between starting and non-starting professional soccer players: A retrospective 21-week examination.

机构信息

Integrative and Experimental Training Science, Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Department of Sports Science and Movement Pedagogy, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0309475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309475. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Aims of the present investigation encompassed: (i) the quantification of training and match loads experienced by starters and non-starters within a professional soccer team; (ii) the identification of variations in these loads across different training modalities, namely, Preparation Training (PT), Match and Match Compensation Training (M&MCT), and their cumulative sum (Total Load; TL); and (iii) the formulation of guidelines aimed at harmonizing the weekly workloads between the groups.

METHODS

Internal and external load of training sessions (n = 97), competitive matches (n = 21) and running based sessions (n = 4) were recorded for 21 weeks to investigate possible heterogeneity between starters and non-starters across PT, M&MCT and TL.

RESULTS

During PT, time spent in heart rate zone 5 (HRZ5) was increased for non-starters (+46.1%). During M&MCT, lower loads for non-starters were found in the rate of perceived exertion (sRPE) (-45.6%), HRZ4 (-54%) and HRZ5 (-77.8%), total distance (TD) (-37%), number of sprints (-58.1%), distance in speed zone 1 (-51.1%), zone 3 (-61.5%) and zone 4 (-59.8%) (SZ1, SZ3&4) and all acceleration and deceleration zones (Acc1-4; Dec1-4) (Acc1: -53.1%; Acc2: -56.3%; Acc3: -59.2%; Acc4: 57.8%) (Dec1: -45.9%; Dec2: -55.2%; Dec3: -63.2%; Dec4: -67.7%). Regarding TL, the non-starters' loads remain lower compared to starters for sRPE (-19.2%), HRZ4 (-21.6%) and HRZ5 (-41.4%), number of sprints (-26.7%), SZ3 (-34.2%), Acc3 (-24.4%), Acc4 (-26.1%), Dec2 (-18.7%), Dec3 (-24%) and Dec4 (-31.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

By implementing a running-based regimen on matchday and MCT the day after (MD+1), TD, distances in SZ1, SZ2, SZ4, SZ5, and counts of accelerations in Acc1&2, as well as Dec1, were effectively replicated for non-starters. All other variables remained unaligned for the non-starters. Given the prevalent emphasis on Small-Sided Games (SSGs) during MCT at MD+1, the incorporation of an additional running-based session for non-starters on MD is advised to address gaps in TD, sprint counts, and high-intensity load variables, such as HRZ4&5 and SZ 3 to 5.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在:(i) 量化职业足球运动员中首发球员和非首发球员在训练和比赛中所承受的负荷;(ii) 确定不同训练模式(准备训练[PT]、比赛和比赛补偿训练[M&MCT]及其累积总和[总负荷;TL])下这些负荷的变化;(iii) 制定旨在协调两组间每周工作量的指南。

方法

记录了 21 周内 97 次训练课、21 场比赛和 4 次基于跑动的训练课的内部和外部负荷,以研究首发球员和非首发球员在 PT、M&MCT 和 TL 之间是否存在异质性。

结果

在 PT 中,非首发球员的心率区 5(HRZ5)时间增加(+46.1%)。在 M&MCT 中,非首发球员的感觉用力等级(sRPE)(-45.6%)、HRZ4(-54%)和 HRZ5(-77.8%)、总距离(TD)(-37%)、冲刺次数(-58.1%)、速度区 1(-51.1%)、区 3(-61.5%)和区 4(-59.8%)(SZ1、SZ3&4)以及所有加速度和减速度区(Acc1-4;Dec1-4)(Acc1:-53.1%;Acc2:-56.3%;Acc3:-59.2%;Acc4:57.8%)(Dec1:-45.9%;Dec2:-55.2%;Dec3:-63.2%;Dec4:-67.7%)的负荷较低。关于 TL,与首发球员相比,非首发球员的 sRPE(-19.2%)、HRZ4(-21.6%)和 HRZ5(-41.4%)、冲刺次数(-26.7%)、SZ3(-34.2%)、Acc3(-24.4%)、Acc4(-26.1%)、Dec2(-18.7%)、Dec3(-24%)和 Dec4(-31.2%)的负荷仍然较低。

结论

通过在比赛日(Match Day;MD)当天和次日(MD+1)实施基于跑动的训练方案以及比赛补偿训练,TD、SZ1、SZ2、SZ4、SZ5 中的距离,以及 Acc1 和 Acc2 中的加速度次数,以及 Dec1,都能有效地复制给非首发球员。非首发球员的所有其他变量仍然不一致。鉴于 MD+1 时比赛补偿训练中普遍强调小场比赛(Small-Sided Games;SSGs),建议非首发球员在 MD 当天增加额外的基于跑动的训练,以解决 TD、冲刺次数和高强度负荷变量(如 HRZ4 和 HRZ5 以及 SZ 3 到 5)方面的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1084/11356445/fbe60705a986/pone.0309475.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验