Chakraborty Rajshekhar, Zanwar Saurabh, Hegenbart Ute, Bhutani Divaya, Gertz Morie A, Dispenzieri Angela, Kumar Shaji, D'Souza Anita, Patwari Anannya, Cowan Andrew, Chen GuiZhen, Milani Paolo, Palladini Giovanni, Sanchorawala Vaishali, Bodanapu Geethika, Schönland Stefan O, Lentzsch Suzanne, Muchtar Eli
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN.
Blood. 2024 Dec 19;144(25):2613-2624. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024025899.
We performed an international retrospective study on 283 patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis to investigate the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization, when treated with frontline daratumumab-based therapy. The cytogenetic subgroups of interest were t(11;14), gain/amp(1q) (hereafter, +1q), hyperdiploidy, deletion(13q), del(17p), and myeloma high-risk (HR) translocations (t[4;14], t[14;16], or t[14;20]). The end points of interest were rate of hematologic complete response (heme-CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and hematologic event-free survival (heme-EFS). The incidence of abnormalities was as follows: t(11;14), 53.4%; deletion (13q), 28.9%; +1q, 22.3%; hyperdiploidy, 19.4%; HR translocations, 6.6%; and deletion(17p), 4.5%. The heme-CR rate by cytogenetic subgroups were as follows: t(11;14) vs no t(11;14), 45.2% vs 41.8% (P=0.597); del(13q) vs no del(13q), 46.8% vs 42.8% (P=0.594); +1q vs no +1q, 30.2% vs 47.9% (P=0.022); hyperdiploidy vs no hyperdiploidy, 39.5% vs 44.9% (P=0.541); HR translocations vs none, 45.5% vs 43.1% (P=0.877); and del(17p) vs no del(17p), 50.0% vs 42.9% (P=0.658), respectively. Similarly, +1q was the only subgroup with a significantly lower VGPR or better rate (64.2% vs 79.0%; P=0.033). At a median follow-up of 19.8 months, the median heme-EFS was 49.6 months (95% CI, 24.7-not reached [NR]), and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 80.98% (95% CI, 75.6-85.4). The presence of +1q was significantly associated with worse heme-EFS on multivariate analysis (HR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.14-3.71; P=0.017). Notably, there was no adverse prognostic impact of t(11;14) on heme-EFS or OS. In conclusion, +1q is associated with worse outcome in the daratumumab-era. Clinical trials testing novel frontline immunotherapies should be enriched in +1q to further improve outcomes in this subgroup.
我们对283例轻链(AL)淀粉样变性患者进行了一项国际回顾性研究,以调查在接受一线基于达雷妥尤单抗的治疗时,荧光原位杂交检测到的细胞遗传学异常对预后的影响。感兴趣的细胞遗传学亚组包括t(11;14)、增益/扩增(1q)(以下简称+1q)、超二倍体、缺失(13q)、缺失(17p)以及骨髓瘤高危(HR)易位(t[4;14]、t[14;16]或t[14;20])。感兴趣的终点是血液学完全缓解(heme-CR)率、非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)或更好的缓解率以及无血液学事件生存期(heme-EFS)。异常的发生率如下:t(11;14)为53.4%;缺失(13q)为28.9%;+1q为22.3%;超二倍体为19.4%;HR易位为6.6%;缺失(17p)为4.5%。各细胞遗传学亚组的heme-CR率如下:t(11;14)组与非t(11;14)组分别为45.2%和41.8%(P=0.597);缺失(13q)组与非缺失(13q)组分别为46.8%和42.8%(P=0.594);+1q组与非+1q组分别为30.2%和47.9%(P=0.022);超二倍体组与非超二倍体组分别为39.5%和44.9%(P=0.541);HR易位组与无HR易位组分别为45.5%和43.1%(P=0.877);缺失(17p)组与非缺失(17p)组分别为50.0%和42.9%(P=0.658)。同样,+1q是唯一VGPR或更好缓解率显著较低的亚组(64.2%对79.0%;P=0.033)。在中位随访19.8个月时,中位heme-EFS为49.6个月(95%CI,24.7 - 未达到[NR]),2年总生存期(OS)为