• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估县卫生部门基础设施变化,以改善社区组织获得联邦资金的机会,亚利桑那州马里科帕县。

Evaluating County Health Department Infrastructure Changes Intended to Improve Access to Federal Funding for Community-Based Organizations, Maricopa County, Arizona.

机构信息

Emily Peterson Johnson, Jessica Cargill, and Rachelle Johnsson Chiang are with the Texas Health Institute, Austin. Erin Appelt and Alexis Arlak are with the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Phoenix, AZ.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(S7):S562-S565. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307740. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307740
PMID:39197140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11425013/
Abstract

In 2021, the Maricopa County Department of Public Health in Maricopa County, Arizona, modified its subcontracting process to engage more community-based organizations that serve populations disproportionately affected by COVID-19. The change allowed subrecipients to receive 40% of grant funding up front. An evaluation found that providing up-front funding engaged smaller-budget organizations. However, factors such as administrative requirements and formal policies associated with government partnerships limited the perceived benefits of up-front funding. These findings are relevant for entities seeking to improve access to federal funding. (. 2024;114(S7):S562-S565. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307740).

摘要

2021 年,亚利桑那州马里科帕县公共卫生部修改了其分包合同流程,以更多地与服务于受 COVID-19 影响不成比例的人群的社区组织合作。这一变化允许次级受援方提前获得 40%的赠款资金。一项评估发现,提供预付款使预算较小的组织参与进来。然而,与政府伙伴关系相关的行政要求和正式政策等因素限制了预付款的预期效益。这些发现对于寻求改善获得联邦资金机会的实体具有相关性。(2024 年;114(S7):S562-S565。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307740)。

相似文献

1
Evaluating County Health Department Infrastructure Changes Intended to Improve Access to Federal Funding for Community-Based Organizations, Maricopa County, Arizona.评估县卫生部门基础设施变化,以改善社区组织获得联邦资金的机会,亚利桑那州马里科帕县。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(S7):S562-S565. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307740. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
COVID-19 Outbreaks Associated With Youth Club Sports: Maricopa County, Arizona, September-November 2020.与青少年俱乐部运动相关的 COVID-19 疫情:亚利桑那州马里科帕县,2020 年 9 月至 11 月。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Feb;112(2):216-219. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306579.
3
State Department of Health's Equitable Funding Allocation Methodology to Address COVID-19 Health Disparities Among High-Risk and Underserved Populations.国务院卫生公平拨款方法,以解决高风险和服务不足人群中的 COVID-19 健康差异。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(S7):S575-S579. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307833. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
Accuracy of Case-Based Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Maricopa County, Arizona.亚利桑那州马里科帕县基于病例的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清阳性率准确性。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jan;112(1):38-42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306568.
5
Ensuring an Equitable Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Pima County, Arizona, Through Local Political Support and Policy Action.通过地方政治支持和政策行动,确保在亚利桑那州皮马县对 COVID-19 大流行做出公平回应。
Public Health Rep. 2024 Jul-Aug;139(1_suppl):16S-22S. doi: 10.1177/00333549231206404. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
6
Not Only How Much But How: The Importance Of Diversifying Funding Streams In A Reimagined Public Health System.不仅要关注数量,还要关注多样性:在重新构想的公共卫生系统中,多样化资金来源的重要性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jun;43(6):846-855. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00037.
7
Local public health agency funding: money begets money.地方公共卫生机构资金:钱生钱。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):188-93. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200703000-00016.
8
Leveraging an established neighbourhood-level, open access wastewater monitoring network to address public health priorities: a population-based study.利用已建立的社区层面、开放获取的污水监测网络解决公共卫生重点问题:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2023 Jan;4(1):e29-e37. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00289-0. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
9
Static public health funding will increase pressure on local government.静态的公共卫生资金将增加地方政府的压力。
BMJ. 2014 Dec 29;349:g7825. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7825.
10
Mpox Vaccine Interest Survey Prioritization and Data Flow: Maricopa County, Arizona, July-August 2022.Mpox 疫苗意向调查优先级排序和数据流:2022 年 7 月至 8 月,美国亚利桑那州马里科帕县。
Am J Public Health. 2023 May;113(5):504-508. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307224. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic Differences in Mortality in the District of Columbia.哥伦比亚特区死亡率的人口统计学差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2290.

本文引用的文献

1
Equitable Partnerships between Community-Based and Traditional Public Health Organizations: Recommendations from the Field.社区为基础的公共卫生组织与传统公共卫生组织之间的公平伙伴关系:来自实地的建议。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(3):445-450. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0060.
2
The Role of Community-Based Organizations in Improving Chronic Care for Safety-Net Populations.社区组织在改善安全网人群慢性护理中的作用。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jul-Aug;34(4):698-708. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.04.200591.
3
Community-based interventions.基于社区的干预措施。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):529-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.529.
4
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.评估健康促进干预措施对公众健康的影响:RE-AIM框架。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.