• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在发生药物过量的情况下,使用物质的人拨打紧急服务的障碍:范围综述。

Barriers to calling emergency services amongst people who use substances in the event of overdose: A scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Oct;132:104559. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104559. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104559
PMID:39197374
Abstract

BACKGROUND

North America is grappling with an ongoing drug overdose crisis. While harm reduction measures like take-home naloxone kits, and supervised consumption sites, have helped reduce mortality, other strategies to address this public health emergency are required. Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) offer legal protection for individuals who report overdoses, yet people who use substances (PWUS) may still hesitate to seek help due to concerns about existing legislation. This scoping review explores barriers preventing PWUS from calling emergency services for overdoses, along with potential solutions and facilitators to address this challenge.

METHODS

PRISMA-ScR was used as a guide to conduct this study. Health sciences librarians searched Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS to identify relevant articles. Six reviewers contributed to screening and extracting the articles through Covidence. Two reviewers performed thematic analysis using NVivo software to identify key barriers and facilitators.

RESULTS

An initial search found 6275 articles for title and abstract screening, resulting in 48 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary barrier to calling 911 pertained to concerns about police arrivng with other first responders, especially regarding their presence and involvement at the scene of overdose. This was followed by legal repercussions, including fear of arrest, incarceration, and fear of eviction, amongst others. Some studies noted the lack of knowledge or trust in GSLs as a deterrent to seeking medical assistance. Additional barriers included concerns about privacy and confidentiality, preference to manage an overdose alone/receive help from another peer, confidence in naloxone effectiveness, limited access to cell phones, peer pressure to not call for help, and identifying as Black, Indigenous, or a Person of Colour (BIPOC). Facilitators include increased GSL awareness among PWUS and law enforcement, expanded legal safeguards for 911 callers, reduced police intervention in overdose cases, and enhanced naloxone availability at key access points.

CONCLUSION

Despite the good intentions of GSLs, PWUS continue to experience significant barriers to calling emergency services in the event of an overdose. Understanding these barriers and key facilitators is necessary to inform future drug policy and advocacy efforts.

摘要

背景

北美洲正在应对一场持续的药物过量危机。尽管减少伤害措施,如携带回家的纳洛酮试剂盒和监督消费场所,已经帮助降低了死亡率,但仍需要采取其他策略来应对这一公共卫生紧急情况。好撒玛利亚人法(Good Samaritan Laws,GSLs)为报告过量用药的个人提供法律保护,但药物使用者(PWUS)可能仍然因为担心现有立法而不愿寻求帮助。本范围审查探讨了阻止 PWUS 因过量用药而拨打紧急服务电话的障碍,以及解决这一挑战的潜在解决方案和促进因素。

方法

PRISMA-ScR 被用作指导进行这项研究。健康科学图书馆员在 Medline、Embase、PsychINFO、CINAHL 和 SCOPUS 中搜索了相关文章。六名评论员通过 Covidence 参与了筛选和提取文章。两名评论员使用 NVivo 软件进行主题分析,以确定关键障碍和促进因素。

结果

初步搜索发现有 6275 篇文章进行了标题和摘要筛选,最终有 48 篇研究符合纳入标准。拨打 911 的主要障碍与担心警察与其他急救人员一起到达有关,特别是担心他们在过量用药现场的出现和参与。其次是法律后果,包括担心被捕、监禁和被驱逐等。一些研究指出,缺乏对 GSL 的了解或信任是寻求医疗帮助的一个障碍。其他障碍包括对隐私和保密性的担忧、更喜欢独自处理过量用药/从另一个同伴那里获得帮助、对纳洛酮有效性的信心、手机使用受限、同伴压力不要寻求帮助,以及认同自己是黑人、原住民或有色人种(BIPOC)。促进因素包括增加 PWUS 和执法人员对 GSL 的认识、扩大 911 来电者的法律保护、减少警察对过量用药案件的干预,以及在关键接入点增加纳洛酮的供应。

结论

尽管好撒玛利亚人法的初衷是好的,但 PWUS 在发生药物过量时继续面临拨打紧急服务电话的重大障碍。了解这些障碍和关键促进因素对于制定未来的毒品政策和宣传工作是必要的。

相似文献

1
Barriers to calling emergency services amongst people who use substances in the event of overdose: A scoping review.在发生药物过量的情况下,使用物质的人拨打紧急服务的障碍:范围综述。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Oct;132:104559. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104559. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Why are some people who have received overdose education and naloxone reticent to call Emergency Medical Services in the event of overdose?为什么一些接受了过量用药教育和纳洛酮治疗的人在发生过量用药时不愿意拨打急救医疗服务?
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Oct;48:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
3
"Caught with a body" yet protected by law? Calling 911 for opioid overdose in the context of the Good Samaritan Law.“携尸被捕”却受法律保护?好撒玛利亚人法背景下因阿片类药物过量拨打 911。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Dec;50:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
A drug-related Good Samaritan Law and calling emergency medical services for drug overdoses in a Canadian setting.在加拿大,与毒品有关的好撒玛利亚人法和拨打急救电话救治毒品过量者。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Aug 26;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00537-w.
5
Using qualitative system dynamics modeling to understand overdose bystander behavior in the context of Connecticut's Good Samaritan Laws and identify effective policy options.运用定性系统动力学建模来理解康涅狄格州好撒玛利亚人法背景下的旁观者过量用药行为,并确定有效的政策选择。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jun 27;21(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00990-3.
6
Correlates of seeking emergency medical help in the event of an overdose in British Columbia, Canada: Findings from the Take Home Naloxone program.在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省,发生用药过量时寻求紧急医疗帮助的相关因素:从“带回家纳洛酮”计划中得出的结果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Sep;71:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Lay responder naloxone access and Good Samaritan law compliance: postcard survey results from 20 Indiana counties.现场响应者纳洛酮获取和好撒玛利亚人法遵从情况:印第安纳州 20 个县的明信片调查结果。
Harm Reduct J. 2018 Apr 6;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12954-018-0226-x.
8
'It's too much, I'm getting really tired of it': Overdose response and structural vulnerabilities among harm reduction workers in community settings.“太多了,我真的受够了”:在社区环境中,减少伤害工作者的过量反应和结构脆弱性。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
9
Overdose responses among rural people who use drugs: A multi-regional qualitative study.农村吸毒人群的药物过量反应:一项多区域定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 May 31;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01007-9.
10
Predictors of seeking emergency medical help during overdose events in a provincial naloxone distribution programme: a retrospective analysis.省级纳洛酮分发项目中过量用药事件期间寻求紧急医疗救助的预测因素:一项回顾性分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 21;6(6):e011224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011224.

引用本文的文献

1
Usability of Mixed Reality for Naloxone Training: Iterative Development and Field Testing of ReviveXR.混合现实技术在纳洛酮培训中的可用性:ReviveXR的迭代开发与现场测试
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;13(12):1449. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121449.
2
The Police Opioid Seizure Temporal Risk (POSTeR) model of increased exposure to fatal overdose.警察阿片类药物缉获时间风险(POSTeR)模型:致命过量暴露增加
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 May;139:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104789. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
3
"I don't let anybody die on my watch": perspectives on the intersection of community overdose response and emergency medical services among people who use drugs in Seattle, WA.
“在我的任期内,我不会让任何人死去”:华盛顿州西雅图市吸毒者对社区过量用药应对与紧急医疗服务交叉点的看法。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Mar 28;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01193-0.
4
Correction: Rapid Assessment Amid an Injection Drug Use-Driven HIV Outbreak in Massachusetts' Merrimack Valley: Highlights from a Case Study.更正:马萨诸塞州梅里马克河谷注射吸毒引发的艾滋病毒疫情期间的快速评估:案例研究要点
AIDS Behav. 2025 Feb;29(2):584-588. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04567-w.
5
Rapid Assessment Amid an Injection Drug Use-Driven HIV Outbreak in Massachusetts' Merrimack Valley: Highlights from a Case Study.马萨诸塞州梅里马克河谷注射吸毒引发的艾滋病毒疫情期间的快速评估:一项案例研究的要点
AIDS Behav. 2025 Feb;29(2):562-583. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04540-7. Epub 2024 Nov 8.