Lübke Laura, Krogmann Diana, Spitzer Carsten
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2024 Nov;74(11):454-459. doi: 10.1055/a-2366-9995. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Empathy as a central element of social cognition plays a decisive role in various psychosocial areas and interpersonal dynamics, especially within the context of psychotherapy. Despite the controversy surrounding a standardized definition, empathy is generally regarded as a multidimensional concept that encompasses both cognitive and affective dimensions. This differentiation between cognitive and affective facets is addressed by a widely used and internationally well-established self-report measure of empathy, the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE). This study focuses on evaluating the psychometric properties of the German version of the QCAE. In a convenience sample (N=1300), the postulated confirmatory five-factor model showed an adequate fit to the underlying structure. The subscales of the QCAE exhibited satisfactory internal consistency and convergent validity with other instruments measuring empathy. Despite certain methodological limitations, our findings suggest that the German version of the QCAE is suitable as a reliable and valid instrument for measuring empathy. Further studies in population-representative samples and clinical populations are required before a clear recommendation regarding its utilization can be provided.
共情作为社会认知的核心要素,在各个心理社会领域和人际互动中起着决定性作用,尤其是在心理治疗的背景下。尽管围绕标准化定义存在争议,但共情通常被视为一个多维概念,涵盖认知和情感两个维度。认知和情感层面的这种区分通过一种广泛使用且在国际上得到认可的共情自我报告测量工具——认知与情感共情问卷(QCAE)来解决。本研究重点评估QCAE德文版的心理测量特性。在一个便利样本(N = 1300)中,假定的验证性五因素模型显示出与潜在结构的充分拟合。QCAE的子量表表现出令人满意的内部一致性,并且与其他测量共情的工具具有收敛效度。尽管存在某些方法上的局限性,但我们的研究结果表明,QCAE德文版适合作为一种可靠且有效的共情测量工具。在能够就其使用提供明确建议之前,还需要在具有人口代表性的样本和临床人群中进行进一步研究。