Jacobs Janette B, Smith-Spark James H, Newton Elizabeth J
Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;14(8):635. doi: 10.3390/bs14080635.
Despite its importance to everyday functioning, reasoning is underexplored in developmental dyslexia. The current study investigated verbal deductive reasoning on the Wason selection task, not previously used in dyslexia research despite its well-established pedigree. Reasoning rule was manipulated, with the conditional rules varying in the logical values presented. The word frequency and imageability of the word terms was also manipulated. Twenty-six adults with dyslexia and 31 adults without dyslexia completed Wason selection task problems. No group difference in reasoning accuracy or completion time was found. However, the participants were most accurate when reasoning with the rule type "" and least accurate with the rule type "". More trials were also answered correctly when the word terms were highly imageable but of average word frequency. These findings are in line with the general reasoning literature. Dyslexia status did not interact with either rule type or word term type. The study expands upon previous research by testing verbal deductive reasoning in dyslexia, highlighting the role of imageability in facilitating reasoning performance for all, regardless of the presence or absence of dyslexia. Implications for the design of educational materials are considered.
尽管推理对日常功能很重要,但在发展性阅读障碍中却未得到充分研究。本研究调查了在韦斯顿选择任务中的言语演绎推理,尽管该任务有良好的研究基础,但此前从未用于阅读障碍研究。对推理规则进行了操纵,条件规则在呈现的逻辑值上有所不同。还对词语的词频和可想象性进行了操纵。26名患有阅读障碍的成年人和31名无阅读障碍的成年人完成了韦斯顿选择任务问题。未发现两组在推理准确性或完成时间上存在差异。然而,参与者在使用“”规则类型进行推理时最准确,而使用“”规则类型时最不准确。当词语具有高可想象性但词频为平均水平时,也有更多的试验被正确回答。这些发现与一般推理文献一致。阅读障碍状态与规则类型或词语类型均未产生交互作用。该研究通过测试阅读障碍中的言语演绎推理扩展了先前的研究,强调了可想象性在促进所有人推理表现中的作用,无论是否存在阅读障碍。文中还考虑了对教育材料设计的启示。