Batzikosta Areti, Moraitou Despina, Steiropoulos Paschalis, Papantoniou Georgia, Kougioumtzis Georgios A, Katsouri Ioanna-Giannoula, Sofologi Maria, Tsolaki Magda
Laboratory of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Brain and Behavior, School of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh), 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Center of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI-AUTH), Balcan Center, Buildings A & B, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 14;14(8):813. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080813.
This study aimed to examine the associations between specific sleep parameters and specific aspects of cognitive functioning in individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), compared with healthy controls (HCs) by using cognitive, subjective, and objective sleep measures. A total of 179 participants were enrolled, all aged ≥ 65 years (mean age = 70.23; SD = 4.74) and with a minimum of six years of education (mean = 12.35; SD = 3.22). The sample included 46 HCs (36 females), 75 individuals with amnestic MCI (aMCI) (51 females), and 58 individuals with non-amnestic MCI (naMCI) (39 females). Inhibition, cognitive flexibility as a combined application of inhibitory control and set shifting or task/rule switching, and planning were examined. The following D-KEFS subtests were administered for their evaluation: Verbal Fluency Test, Color-Word Interference Test, and Tower Test. Self-reported sleep questionnaires (Athens Insomnia Scale, Stop-Bang questionnaire, and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index) were used for subjective sleep assessments. Actigraphy was used for objective sleep measurements. Mixed-measures ANOVA, MANOVA, and one-way ANOVA, as well as the Scheffe post hoc test, were applied to the data. The results showed that the three groups exhibited statistically significant differences in the Tower Test (total achievement score, total number of administered problems, and total rule violations). As regards objective sleep measurements, the total sleep time (TST) was measured using actigraphy, and indicated that there are significant differences, with the HC group having a significantly higher mean TST compared to the naMCI group. The relationships evaluated in the TST Tower Test were found to be statistically significant. The findings are discussed in the context of potential parameters that can support the connection between sleep duration, measured as TST, and cognitive planning, as measured using the Tower Test.
本研究旨在通过认知、主观和客观睡眠测量方法,考察被诊断为轻度认知障碍(MCI)的个体与健康对照(HCs)相比,特定睡眠参数与认知功能特定方面之间的关联。共招募了179名参与者,年龄均≥65岁(平均年龄 = 70.23;标准差 = 4.74),且至少接受过六年教育(平均 = 12.35;标准差 = 3.22)。样本包括46名HCs(36名女性)、75名遗忘型MCI(aMCI)个体(51名女性)和58名非遗忘型MCI(naMCI)个体(39名女性)。研究考察了抑制、作为抑制控制和定势转换或任务/规则切换的组合应用的认知灵活性以及计划能力。使用以下D-KEFS子测验进行评估:言语流畅性测验、颜色-词语干扰测验和塔测验。使用自我报告的睡眠问卷(雅典失眠量表、Stop-Bang问卷和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数)进行主观睡眠评估。使用活动记录仪进行客观睡眠测量。对数据应用了混合测量方差分析、多变量方差分析和单因素方差分析,以及谢费事后检验。结果表明,三组在塔测验(总成绩得分、所呈现问题的总数和总规则违反数)上表现出统计学上的显著差异。关于客观睡眠测量,使用活动记录仪测量总睡眠时间(TST),结果表明存在显著差异,HC组的平均TST显著高于naMCI组。在TST与塔测验之间评估的关系具有统计学意义。本研究在可能支持以TST衡量的睡眠时间与以塔测验衡量的认知计划之间联系的潜在参数背景下讨论了这些发现。