Yocum Derek, Ovispo-Martinez Alejandro, Valenzuela Kevin A, Wen Chen, Cates Harold, Zhang Songning
South Bend Orthopaedics, South Bend, IN 46635, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, & Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 28;11(8):763. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080763.
Due to the high risk of a bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKR) following unilateral TKR, this study was performed to investigate bilateral TKR patients. Specifically, we examined biomechanical differences between the first replaced and second replaced limbs of bilateral patients. Furthermore, we examined bilateral TKR effects on hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics, compared to the replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients. Eleven bilateral patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and fifteen unilateral TKR patients (65.67 ± 6.18 years, 1.73 ± 0.10 m, 87.72 ± 15.70 kg) were analyzed while performing level walking. A repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze between-limb differences within the bilateral TKR group. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) ANOVA was used to determine differences between bilateral and unilateral patients. Our results showed that the second replaced limb exhibited a lower peak initial-stance knee extension moment than the first replaced limb. No other kinematic or kinetic differences were found. Bilateral patients exhibited lower initial-stance knee extension moments, knee abduction moments, and dorsiflexion moments, compared to unilateral patients. Bilateral patients also exhibited lower push-off peak hip flexion moments and vertical GRF. The differences between the first and second replaced limbs of bilateral patients may indicate different adaptation strategies used following a second TKR. The significant group differences indicate that adaptations are different between these groups, and it is not recommended to use patients with unilateral and bilateral TKR together in gait analyses.
由于单侧全膝关节置换术(TKR)后进行双侧全膝关节置换术的风险较高,因此开展了本研究以调查双侧全膝关节置换术患者。具体而言,我们检查了双侧患者首次置换肢体和第二次置换肢体之间的生物力学差异。此外,与单侧患者的置换肢体和未置换肢体相比,我们研究了双侧全膝关节置换术对髋、膝和踝关节生物力学的影响。在11名双侧患者(70.09±5.41岁,身高1.71±0.08米,体重91.78±13.00千克)和15名单侧全膝关节置换术患者(65.67±6.18岁,身高1.73±0.10米,体重87.72±15.70千克)进行平地行走时进行了分析。采用重复测量单因素方差分析来分析双侧全膝关节置换术组内肢体间的差异。使用2×2(肢体×组)方差分析来确定双侧和单侧患者之间的差异。我们的结果显示,第二次置换的肢体在初始站立期的膝关节伸展力矩峰值低于首次置换的肢体。未发现其他运动学或动力学差异。与单侧患者相比,双侧患者在初始站立期的膝关节伸展力矩、膝关节外展力矩和背屈力矩较低。双侧患者在蹬离期的髋关节屈曲力矩峰值和垂直地面反作用力也较低。双侧患者首次和第二次置换肢体之间的差异可能表明第二次全膝关节置换术后采用了不同的适应策略。显著的组间差异表明这些组之间的适应情况不同,不建议在步态分析中将单侧和双侧全膝关节置换术患者一起使用。