• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对食品安全的认知与统计生命价值评估:一项条件价值评估研究。

Consumer Perception of Food Safety and Valuation of Statistical Life: A Contingent Valuation Study.

作者信息

Liu Bingjie, Na Yinuo, Li Yi, Wang Dan, Zhang Xin

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):2597. doi: 10.3390/foods13162597.

DOI:10.3390/foods13162597
PMID:39200524
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353710/
Abstract

The value of statistical life (VSL) reflects the trade-off between money and the risk of death. It is a key indicator for conducting regulatory impact assessments. The main purpose of this study was to estimate the VSL in the field of food safety. At the same time, it investigates respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for reducing the risk of death from foodborne illnesses and explores the impact of factors such as the average household monthly income, health status, and education level on WTP. We conducted a survey using an open-ended contingent valuation method among 1307 respondents aged 18 and above to determine their WTP. Based on the WTP survey results, we calculated the VSL in the food safety sector. We used binary logit and Tobit models to analyze the influencing factors. The results of the study show that the median WTP for reducing the risk of foodborne illness is CNY 100 (USD 16), and the estimated VSL is approximately CNY 9.09 million (USD 141 million). Indicators such as the average household monthly income, health status, and education level are important factors affecting WTP. This study will help practitioners, researchers, and policymakers understand the current population's attitudes towards food safety regulations and determine the priorities for regulatory implementation. Future research can explore the effects of different elicitation methods, cultural differences, and regional variations on WTP and VSL.

摘要

统计生命价值(VSL)反映了金钱与死亡风险之间的权衡。它是进行监管影响评估的关键指标。本研究的主要目的是估计食品安全领域的统计生命价值。同时,调查受访者为降低食源性疾病死亡风险的支付意愿(WTP),并探讨家庭月平均收入、健康状况和教育水平等因素对支付意愿的影响。我们采用开放式条件价值评估法对1307名18岁及以上的受访者进行了调查,以确定他们的支付意愿。基于支付意愿调查结果,我们计算了食品安全领域的统计生命价值。我们使用二元logit模型和Tobit模型分析影响因素。研究结果表明,降低食源性疾病风险的支付意愿中位数为100元人民币(16美元),估计的统计生命价值约为909万元人民币(1.41亿美元)。家庭月平均收入、健康状况和教育水平等指标是影响支付意愿的重要因素。本研究将有助于从业者、研究人员和政策制定者了解当前民众对食品安全法规的态度,并确定监管实施的重点。未来的研究可以探讨不同诱导方法、文化差异和地区差异对支付意愿和统计生命价值的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cf8/11353710/2fdf5e463dd5/foods-13-02597-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cf8/11353710/8f6169b9ba2a/foods-13-02597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cf8/11353710/2fdf5e463dd5/foods-13-02597-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cf8/11353710/8f6169b9ba2a/foods-13-02597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cf8/11353710/2fdf5e463dd5/foods-13-02597-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Consumer Perception of Food Safety and Valuation of Statistical Life: A Contingent Valuation Study.消费者对食品安全的认知与统计生命价值评估:一项条件价值评估研究。
Foods. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):2597. doi: 10.3390/foods13162597.
2
Contingent Valuation: A Pilot Study for Eliciting Willingness to Pay for a Reduction in Mortality From Vaccine-Preventable Illnesses for Children and Adults in Bangladesh.条件价值评估:在孟加拉国为儿童和成人因疫苗可预防疾病而降低死亡率的意愿支付意愿的初步研究。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 May;24:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.10.004. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
Value of a statistical life estimation of carcinogenic chemicals for socioeconomic analysis in Korea.韩国用于社会经济分析的致癌化学物质统计生命价值估计
Environ Health Toxicol. 2015 Jun 12;30 Suppl:s2015005. doi: 10.5620/eht.s2015005. eCollection 2015.
4
Residential open space and the perception of health benefits: How much is the public willing to pay?住宅开放空间与健康效益感知:公众愿意支付多少?
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115273. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115273. Epub 2022 May 13.
5
Willingness to pay for HPV vaccine among female health care workers in a Chinese nationwide survey.中国全国范围内一项调查研究显示,女性医护工作者对 HPV 疫苗的支付意愿。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):1324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08716-6.
6
The willingness to pay for in vitro fertilization: a pilot study using contingent valuation.体外受精的支付意愿:一项使用条件价值评估法的试点研究。
Med Care. 1994 Jul;32(7):686-99. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00003.
7
Willingness to Pay for National Health Insurance: A Contingent Valuation Study Among Patients Visiting Public Hospitals in Melaka, Malaysia.支付意愿对国家健康保险的影响:马来西亚马六甲公立医院就诊患者的意愿调查评估。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Mar;20(2):255-267. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00691-z. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Willingness to pay for a National Health Insurance Scheme in The Gambia: a contingent valuation study.冈比亚国民健康保险计划支付意愿的意愿调查研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Jan 6;38(1):61-73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac089.
9
The acceptance and willingness to pay (WTP) for hypothetical dengue vaccine in Penang, Malaysia: a contingent valuation study.马来西亚槟城对假设的登革热疫苗的接受度和支付意愿:一项条件价值评估研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Nov 22;16:60. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0163-2. eCollection 2018.
10
What is a life worth? Robustness of VSL values from contingent valuation surveys.生命的价值何在?条件价值评估调查中VSL值的稳健性。
Risk Anal. 2005 Aug;25(4):783-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00646.x.

本文引用的文献

1
U.S. Consumers' Tree Nut Food Safety Knowledge, Perceptions, and Handling Practices across Demographic Groups.美国不同人口群体消费者对树坚果类食品的安全知识、认知及处理方式
Foods. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):4289. doi: 10.3390/foods12234289.
2
How Much Is a Human Life Worth? A Systematic Review.一条人命价值几何?系统评价
Value Health. 2021 Oct;24(10):1531-1541. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
The roles of pollution concerns and environmental knowledge in making green food choices: Evidence from Chinese consumers.
污染关注和环境知识在选择绿色食品中的作用:来自中国消费者的证据。
Food Res Int. 2020 Apr;130:108881. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108881. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
4
What is the health cost of haze pollution? Evidence from China.雾霾污染的健康成本是多少?来自中国的证据。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Oct;34(4):1290-1303. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2791. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Willingness to pay for mortality risk reduction for traffic accidents in Myanmar.缅甸民众对降低道路交通事故死亡率的支付意愿
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
Valuing Reductions in Fatal Illness Risks: Implications of Recent Research.重视致命疾病风险的降低:近期研究的启示
Health Econ. 2016 Aug;25(8):1039-52. doi: 10.1002/hec.3214. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
7
Diminishing willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year: valuing acute foodborne illness.质量调整生命年支付意愿递减:评估急性食源性疾病。
Risk Anal. 2011 Sep;31(9):1363-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01617.x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
8
Dead reckoning: demographic determinants of the accuracy of mortality risk perceptions.航位推算:死亡率风险认知准确性的人口统计学决定因素
Risk Anal. 2004 Jun;24(3):651-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00465.x.