Suppr超能文献

航位推算:死亡率风险认知准确性的人口统计学决定因素

Dead reckoning: demographic determinants of the accuracy of mortality risk perceptions.

作者信息

Hakes Jahn Karl, Viscusi W Kip

机构信息

Clemson University, Department of Economics, Clemson, SC 29634-1309, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2004 Jun;24(3):651-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00465.x.

Abstract

General patterns of bias in risk beliefs are well established in the literature, but much less is known about how these biases vary across the population. Using a sample of almost 500 people, the regression analysis in this article yields results consistent with the well-established pattern that small risks are overassessed and large risks are underassessed. The accuracy of these risk beliefs varies across demographic factors, as does the switch point at which people go from underassessment to overassessment, which we found to be 1500 deaths annually for the full sample. Better educated people have more accurate risk beliefs, and there are important differences in the risk perception by race and gender that also may be of policy interest.

摘要

风险认知偏差的一般模式在文献中已得到充分证实,但对于这些偏差在人群中的差异情况,我们所知甚少。本文以近500人为样本进行回归分析,得出的结果与已充分证实的模式一致,即小风险被高估,大风险被低估。这些风险认知的准确性因人口统计学因素而异,人们从低估转向高估的转折点也因人口统计学因素而不同,我们发现全样本的转折点是每年1500人死亡。受教育程度较高的人对风险的认知更准确,而且在种族和性别方面的风险认知也存在重要差异,这可能也具有政策意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验