• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导航真实世界的随机临床试验:“父母是孩子的老师”的经验。

Navigating Real-World Randomized Clinical Trials: The 'Parents as Teachers' Experience.

机构信息

LeCroy & Milligan Associates, Inc., Tucson, AZ 85743, USA.

Trewon Technologies, LLC, Leesburg, VA 20176, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;21(8):1082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081082.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21081082
PMID:39200691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11354179/
Abstract

The Parents as Teachers Randomized Controlled Trial (PAT RCT) Case Study investigates the multifaceted impact of implementing the PAT RCT in Arizona, U.S.A., shedding light on both the positive and negative effects. There has been a recent focus on improving the implementation of RCTs in community settings, as this issue has not been fully addressed. This research presents a case study examining the implementation of a community-based RCT in home visitation. This study also addresses the strategies that can be employed to mitigate some of the challenges in the implementation of an RCT, offering valuable insights for future RCTs in the domain of home visiting. The PAT program, aimed at providing parent education and family engagement for children from birth to kindergarten, encompasses a range of services, including personal visits, group connections, child screenings, and community resource linkages. The Parents as Teachers Randomized Controlled Trial (PAT RCT) directly promotes health by educating parents about health and wellness as well as providing early child screenings and heath referrals, all of which enhance health outcomes through timely interventions and improved parental practices. Lessons from the study also aim to improve the implementation of future health-related RCTs, ensuring effective delivery and impactful results.

摘要

家长作为教师随机对照试验(PAT RCT)案例研究调查了在美国亚利桑那州实施 PAT RCT 的多方面影响,揭示了积极和消极两方面的影响。最近人们越来越关注改善社区环境中 RCT 的实施,因为这个问题尚未得到充分解决。本研究通过案例研究的方式,考察了在家庭探访中实施基于社区的 RCT 的情况。本研究还探讨了可以采用哪些策略来减轻 RCT 实施中的一些挑战,为未来家庭探访领域的 RCT 提供了有价值的见解。PAT 计划旨在为从出生到幼儿园的儿童提供家长教育和家庭参与,包括个人访问、团体联系、儿童筛查和社区资源联系等一系列服务。家长作为教师随机对照试验(PAT RCT)通过教育家长有关健康和健康的知识,以及提供早期儿童筛查和健康转介,直接促进健康,通过及时干预和改善父母的做法来提高健康结果。研究中的经验教训还旨在改善未来与健康相关的 RCT 的实施,确保有效的交付和有影响力的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11354179/744986d9aef4/ijerph-21-01082-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11354179/0b301ce24d44/ijerph-21-01082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11354179/744986d9aef4/ijerph-21-01082-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11354179/0b301ce24d44/ijerph-21-01082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11354179/744986d9aef4/ijerph-21-01082-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigating Real-World Randomized Clinical Trials: The 'Parents as Teachers' Experience.导航真实世界的随机临床试验:“父母是孩子的老师”的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;21(8):1082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081082.
2
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.
3
The Parents as Teachers program: results from two demonstrations.“家长即老师”项目:两项示范项目的结果
Future Child. 1999 Spring-Summer;9(1):91-115, 179-89.
4
Stockholm preterm interaction-based intervention (SPIBI) - study protocol for an RCT of a 12-month parallel-group post-discharge program for extremely preterm infants and their parents.斯德哥尔摩基于早产期互动的干预措施(SPIBI)——一项针对极早产儿及其父母的为期12个月的出院后平行组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Feb 1;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1934-4.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Face to face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.为向父母宣传或教育有关幼儿疫苗接种的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub2.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
9
Disseminating and implementing a lifestyle-based healthy weight program for mothers in a national organization: a study protocol for a cluster randomized trial.在全国性组织中推广和实施基于生活方式的健康体重计划:一项针对群组随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 25;14(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0916-0.
10
Home Visiting: A Service Strategy to Reduce Poverty and Mitigate Its Consequences.家访:一项减少贫困及其影响的服务策略。
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3 Suppl):S105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.005.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized controlled trials-a critical re-appraisal.随机对照试验——一项批判性重新评估
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Aug;44(4):2085-2089. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01401-4. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions.随机对照试验的完整性:挑战与解决方案。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Jun;113(6):1113-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol.提高随机对照试验中保留率的系统技术:STEER研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0.
4
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.实用随机对照试验中的伦理问题:对近期文献的综述揭示了伦理论证方面的差距。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x.
5
What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews.哪些类型的干预措施会产生不平等?系统评价的证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Feb;67(2):190-3. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201257. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
6
The case study approach.案例研究法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 27;11:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100.
7
Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care.21世纪整群随机试验的经验教训:基层医疗试验的系统评价
Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;1(1):80-90. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn006rr.
8
Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals.整群随机试验的偏倚风险证据:对发表在三本综合医学期刊上的近期试验的综述
BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):785-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7418.785.
9
Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important?理解对照试验。为什么随机对照试验很重要?
BMJ. 1998 Jan 17;316(7126):201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7126.201.