Cappella Annalisa, Gaffuri Francesca, Yang Josh, Tartaglia Francesco Carlo, Solazzo Riccardo, Inchingolo Francesco, Tartaglia Gianluca Martino, Sforza Chiarella
U.O. Laboratory of Applied Morphology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 12;13(16):4740. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164740.
: Three-dimensional (3D) analysis of maxillofacial structures in dysmorphic patients offers clinical advantages over 2D analysis due to its high accuracy and precision in measuring many morphological parameters. Currently, no reliable gold standard exists for calculating 3D volumetric measurements of maxillofacial structures when captured by 3D surface imaging techniques. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the scientific literature related to 3D surface imaging methods used for volumetric analysis of the dysmorphic maxillofacial structures of patients affected by CL/P or other syndromes and to provide an update on the existing protocols, methods, and, when available, reference data. : A total of 17 papers selected according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed for the qualitative analysis out of more than 4500 articles published between 2002 and 2024 that were retrieved from the main electronic scientific databases according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A qualitative synthesis of the protocols used for the selection of the anatomical areas of interest and details on the methods used for the calculation of their volume was completed. : The results suggest a great degree of heterogeneity between the reviewed studies in all the aspects analysed (patient population, anatomical structure, area selection, and volume calculation), which prevents any chance of direct comparison between the reported volumetric data. : Our qualitative analysis revealed dissimilarities in the procedures specified in the studies, highlighting the need to develop uniform methods and protocols and the need for comparative studies to verify the validity of methods in order to achieve high levels of scientific evidence, homogeneity of volumetric data, and clinical consensus on the methods to use for 3D volumetric surface-based analysis.
由于在测量许多形态学参数方面具有高精度和准确性,对畸形患者的颌面结构进行三维(3D)分析比二维分析具有临床优势。目前,当通过3D表面成像技术捕获颌面结构的3D体积测量值时,不存在可靠的金标准。本范围综述的目的是概述与用于CL/P或其他综合征患者畸形颌面结构体积分析的3D表面成像方法相关的科学文献,并提供现有方案、方法以及(如有)参考数据的更新。根据严格的纳入和排除标准,从2002年至2024年期间在主要电子科学数据库中检索到的4500多篇文章中,共筛选出17篇论文进行定性分析。完成了用于选择感兴趣解剖区域的方案的定性综合以及用于计算其体积的方法的详细信息。结果表明,在所分析的所有方面(患者群体、解剖结构、区域选择和体积计算),综述研究之间存在很大程度的异质性,这使得所报告的体积数据无法进行直接比较。我们的定性分析揭示了研究中规定的程序存在差异,强调需要开发统一的方法和方案,以及需要进行比较研究以验证方法的有效性,以便获得高水平的科学证据、体积数据的同质性以及关于用于基于3D体积表面分析的方法的临床共识。