Wu Jingchao, Zhu Guanyu, Gan Yifei, Meng Fangang, Yang Anchao, Zhang Jianguo
Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):4902. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164902.
Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) has been used for the treatment of medically refractory dystonia with excellent results. In this study, we compared in detail the therapeutic advantages of two DBS targets for generalized isolated dystonia. In this retrospective study, we recruited 29 patients with generalized isolated dystonia who had undergone DBS treatment targeting either the globus pallidus interna (GPi) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in the Department of Functional Neurosurgery at Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China, between January 2016 and December 2021. The movement and disability subscales of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) were used to assess the severity of their dystonic symptoms and their activities of daily living, respectively. SF-36 was used to evaluate the patients' health-related quality of life. The percentage improvement in the BFMDRS-M score at 6 months relative to the baseline score was clearly higher in the STN group (63.91%) than in the GPi group (38.36%). At the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, the percentage improvement in arm symptoms was significantly higher after DBS of the STN (70.64%, 80.66%, and 76.89%, respectively) than after stimulation of the GPi (36.75%, 34.21%, and 38.47%, respectively). At 12 months after surgery, patient quality of life had improved on all SF-36 subscales in both groups. STN-DBS may have more advantages than GPi-DBS in patients with obvious arm dystonia. STN-DBS had a better clinical effect than GPi-DBS within 6 months after surgery.
脑深部电刺激术(DBS)已被用于治疗药物难治性肌张力障碍,效果极佳。在本研究中,我们详细比较了两种DBS靶点治疗全身性孤立性肌张力障碍的治疗优势。在这项回顾性研究中,我们招募了29例全身性孤立性肌张力障碍患者,这些患者于2016年1月至2021年12月期间在中国北京天坛医院功能神经外科接受了以内侧苍白球(GPi)或丘脑底核(STN)为靶点的DBS治疗。分别使用伯克-法恩-马斯登肌张力障碍评定量表(BFMDRS)的运动和残疾分量表来评估其肌张力障碍症状的严重程度及日常生活活动能力。采用SF-36评估患者的健康相关生活质量。STN组在6个月时BFMDRS-M评分相对于基线评分的改善百分比(63.91%)明显高于GPi组(38.36%)。在3个月、6个月和12个月的随访中,STN进行DBS术后手臂症状的改善百分比(分别为70.64%、80.66%和76.89%)显著高于GPi刺激术后(分别为36.75%、34.21%和38.47%)。术后12个月时,两组患者在所有SF-36分量表上的生活质量均有所改善。对于有明显手臂肌张力障碍的患者,STN-DBS可能比GPi-DBS更具优势。术后6个月内,STN-DBS的临床效果优于GPi-DBS。