Cordani Claudio, Perillo Sergio, Corbetta Davide, Sarasso Elisabetta, Agosta Federica, Filippi Massimo, Mazzali Angelo G, Pennestrì Federico
Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University "La Statale", 20122 Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;12(16):1628. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161628.
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the Italian National Health Service (NHS) has been undergoing a structural reform shifting focus from hospital-centered care to smaller, intermediate, or primary health facilities closer to the community (e.g., community hospitals and community houses). This reorganization should include rehabilitation and physiotherapy, but the actual spread of these services is still unclear.
This study explored the number and characteristics of community-based physiotherapy services in the Metropolitan City of Milan (Italy).
Between April and May 2024, we distributed a structured, anonymous online survey about community physiotherapy services and users to all Directors of the Health and Social Care Professions Departments (DAPSS) in the Metropolitan City of Milan. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the number of community houses offering physiotherapy services, the specific intervention areas, and access modalities.
Six out of seven DAPSS Directors completed the survey (87%). Thirty-seven community houses were reported in the area, with fourteen of these offering physiotherapy services. In most of them, physiotherapy was a primary reason for access following a general practitioner's prescription. Five out of six responders reported that rehabilitation needs were mainly assessed by specialists in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, with physiotherapists involved in the assessment process in two cases. Physiotherapists primarily handled the intervention phase, dealing mainly with orthopedic and neurological conditions. DAPSS Directors noted that additional physiotherapy initiatives focusing on prevention will be implemented.
Physiotherapy services are becoming available in the Metropolitan City of Milan. However, more efforts are needed to facilitate access and ensure tailored assessment and effective interventions, particularly in preventive care. Future investigations should help to better define the number and the characteristics of the patients who can most benefit from this type of care, the number of sessions they need, and with what types of intervention; it would be also necessary to better define the communication network in the area that allows doctors, health professionals, and patients to be informed about this possibility.
自新冠疫情以来,意大利国家医疗服务体系(NHS)一直在进行结构改革,重点从以医院为中心的护理转向更贴近社区的规模较小的中级或初级卫生设施(如社区医院和社区之家)。这种重组应包括康复和物理治疗,但这些服务的实际普及情况仍不明确。
本研究探讨了意大利米兰市辖区内社区物理治疗服务的数量和特点。
2024年4月至5月期间,我们向米兰市辖区内所有卫生和社会护理专业部门主任(DAPSS)发放了一份关于社区物理治疗服务及用户的结构化匿名在线调查问卷。我们使用描述性统计分析提供物理治疗服务的社区之家数量、具体干预领域和就诊方式。
七名DAPSS主任中有六人完成了调查(87%)。该地区报告有37个社区之家,其中14个提供物理治疗服务。在大多数社区之家中,物理治疗是根据全科医生的处方就诊的主要原因。六名受访者中有五人表示,康复需求主要由物理医学与康复专家评估,有两例评估过程中有物理治疗师参与。物理治疗师主要负责干预阶段,主要处理骨科和神经科疾病。DAPSS主任指出,将实施更多侧重于预防的物理治疗举措。
米兰市辖区内已有物理治疗服务。然而,仍需做出更多努力以便利就诊,并确保进行个性化评估和有效干预,尤其是在预防保健方面。未来的调查应有助于更好地确定最能从这类护理中受益的患者数量和特点、他们所需的疗程数量以及干预类型;还需要更好地确定该地区的沟通网络,以便医生、卫生专业人员和患者了解这种可能性。