Suppr超能文献

成人和老年人家庭护理服务的成本效益:系统评价。

The Cost-Effectiveness of Homecare Services for Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Institute of Nutrition, State University of Rio de Janeiro, R. São Francisco Xavier, 524-12º Andar-Bloco E-Sala 12008-Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro 20550-170, Brazil.

Department of Family Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Boulevard 28 de Setembro, 77-Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro 20551-030, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3373. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043373.

Abstract

This study provides an overview of the literature on the cost-effectiveness of homecare services compared to in-hospital care for adults and older adults. A systematic review was performed using Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and CENTRAL databases from inception to April 2022. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) (older) adults; (ii) homecare as an intervention; (iii) hospital care as a comparison; (iv) a full economic evaluation examining both costs and consequences; and (v) economic evaluations arising from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. Of the 14 studies identified, homecare, when compared to hospital care, was cost-saving in seven studies, cost-effective in two and more effective in one. The evidence suggests that homecare interventions are likely to be cost-saving and as effective as hospital. However, the included studies differ regarding the methods used, the types of costs and the patient populations of interest. In addition, methodological limitations were identified in some studies. Definitive conclusions are limited and highlight the need for better standardization of economic evaluations in this area. Further economic evaluations arising from well-designed RCTs would allow healthcare decision-makers to feel more confident in considering homecare interventions.

摘要

本研究综述了家庭护理服务相对于成人和老年人住院护理的成本效益的文献。使用 Medline、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 CENTRAL 数据库从建库到 2022 年 4 月进行了系统评价。纳入标准如下:(i)(老年)成年人;(ii)家庭护理作为干预措施;(iii)医院护理作为比较;(iv)全面的经济评估,同时考虑成本和结果;以及(v)来自随机对照试验(RCT)的经济评估。两名独立评审员选择研究、提取数据和评估研究质量。在确定的 14 项研究中,与住院护理相比,有 7 项研究表明家庭护理具有成本节约效果,2 项研究具有成本效益,1 项研究更有效。证据表明,家庭护理干预措施可能具有成本节约效果且与住院治疗效果相当。然而,纳入的研究在使用的方法、成本类型和关注的患者人群方面存在差异。此外,一些研究存在方法学局限性。因此,无法得出明确的结论,这突显了在该领域更好地标准化经济评估的必要性。来自精心设计的 RCT 的进一步经济评估将使医疗保健决策者更有信心考虑家庭护理干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2b/9960182/3fbffd0a0c45/ijerph-20-03373-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验