• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

站立、坐立、俯卧和仰卧位的眼压测量

Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, Prone, and Supine Positions.

作者信息

De Bernardo Maddalena, Cione Ferdinando, De Pascale Ilaria, Pagliarulo Sergio, Rosa Nicola

机构信息

Eye Unit, Department of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 4;14(8):826. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080826.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14080826
PMID:39202017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355470/
Abstract

In this study, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (ST) positions and again five minutes after standing (ST-5) utilizing a Tono-Pen AVIA in 124 eyes of 62 healthy subjects with ages ranging from 21 to 59 years (mean 30 ± 10 years). In each subject, the average IOP of both eyes was used for the statistical evaluation. The mean IOP difference between the ST and sitting positions was -0.13 ± 1.63 mmHg ( = 0.548); between ST-5 and sitting, it was 0.53 ± 1.24 mmHg ( = 0.001); between supine and sitting, it was 1.30 ± 1.48 mmHg ( < 0.001); between ST and supine, it was -1.43 ± 1.74 mmHg ( < 0.001); between ST-5 and supine, it was -0.77 ± 1.59 mmHg ( < 0.001); between prone and supine, it was 2.24 ± 1.92 mmHg ( < 0.001); between ST and ST-5, it was -0.67 ± 1.84 mmHg (range: -7.5 to 5 mmHg) ( = 0.007); between prone and ST, it was 3.46 ± 2.01 mmHg ( < 0.001); between ST-5 and prone, it was -2.46 ± 1.67 mmHg ( < 0.001); and between sitting and prone, it was -3.22 ± 1.56 mmHg ( < 0.001). The results show a significant IOP increase in the ST-5 position, suggesting that such measurements need to be performed in an attempt to explain the progression of glaucoma in apparently normal-tension patients.

摘要

在本研究中,使用托诺笔AVIA眼压计对62名年龄在21至59岁(平均30±10岁)的健康受试者的124只眼睛,在坐位、仰卧位、俯卧位和站立位(ST)测量眼压,并在站立5分钟后(ST - 5)再次测量。在每个受试者中,双眼的平均眼压用于统计评估。站立位与坐位之间的平均眼压差异为-0.13±1.63 mmHg(P = 0.548);ST - 5与坐位之间为0.53±1.24 mmHg(P = 0.001);仰卧位与坐位之间为1.30±1.48 mmHg(P < 0.001);站立位与仰卧位之间为-1.43±1.74 mmHg(P < 0.001);ST - 5与仰卧位之间为-0.77±1.59 mmHg(P < 0.001);俯卧位与仰卧位之间为2.24±1.92 mmHg(P < 0.001);站立位与ST - 5之间为-0.67±1.84 mmHg(范围:-7.5至5 mmHg)(P = 0.007);俯卧位与站立位之间为3.46±2.01 mmHg(P < 0.001);ST - 5与俯卧位之间为-2.46±1.67 mmHg(P < 0.001);坐位与俯卧位之间为-3.22±1.56 mmHg(P < 0.001)。结果显示,在ST - 5位眼压显著升高,这表明需要进行此类测量,以试图解释眼压看似正常的患者青光眼的进展情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/6c2a5e62803a/jpm-14-00826-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/23e42f4dc27d/jpm-14-00826-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/d3e650298fe6/jpm-14-00826-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/910e50b6b380/jpm-14-00826-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/ad140d24e823/jpm-14-00826-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/8efcdb4d19aa/jpm-14-00826-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/bc26511b654f/jpm-14-00826-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/1e8118a7eaf9/jpm-14-00826-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/e1cd20861360/jpm-14-00826-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/6c2a5e62803a/jpm-14-00826-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/23e42f4dc27d/jpm-14-00826-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/d3e650298fe6/jpm-14-00826-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/910e50b6b380/jpm-14-00826-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/ad140d24e823/jpm-14-00826-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/8efcdb4d19aa/jpm-14-00826-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/bc26511b654f/jpm-14-00826-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/1e8118a7eaf9/jpm-14-00826-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/e1cd20861360/jpm-14-00826-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11355470/6c2a5e62803a/jpm-14-00826-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, Prone, and Supine Positions.站立、坐立、俯卧和仰卧位的眼压测量
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 4;14(8):826. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080826.
2
Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers.站立、坐立和仰卧位眼压测量:托诺笔Avia眼压计与Icare Pro眼压计的比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 22;11(21):6234. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216234.
3
Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer.使用回弹式眼压计测量站立位眼压
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Oct 18;55(10):701. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100701.
4
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements between Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer and Tono-Pen XL Tonometer in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Body Positions.仰卧位和侧卧位时Icare Pro回弹式眼压计与Tono-Pen XL眼压计眼压测量结果的比较。
Curr Eye Res. 2015 Sep;40(9):923-9. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.964416. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
5
Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure in supine and lateral decubitus body postures.白内障手术对仰卧位和侧卧位时眼压的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;64(10):727-732. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.195000.
6
[Posture-induced intraocular pressure measurements].[姿势诱导眼压测量]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 May;50(5):333-7.
7
Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes among patients with primary open angle glaucoma in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: Any implication for management.尼日利亚一家三级医院原发性开角型青光眼患者的体位性眼压变化:对治疗的影响。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;25(4):395-400. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_642_20.
8
Intraocular Pressure Variations in Postural Changes: Comparison between Obese and Non-Obese Controls.姿势变化时的眼压变化:肥胖与非肥胖对照的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 10;12(18):5883. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185883.
9
Intraocular pressure in children: the effect of body position as assessed by Icare and Tono-Pen tonometers.儿童眼压:通过Icare眼压计和Tono-Pen眼压计评估体位的影响
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;158(6):1348-1352.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
10
Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions.在坐姿和仰卧位下,使用 Icare PRO 回弹眼压计、Tono-Pen AVIA 和 Goldmann 眼压计测量眼压的重复性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep 5;13:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-44.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of altitude on the differences between Goldmann tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry: An ecological meta-analysis.海拔对Goldmann眼压计与帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计测量结果差异的影响:一项生态荟萃分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 1;72(Suppl 3):S398-S403. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_907_23. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
2
Analysis of Various Modalities for Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Relation to Keratoconus Severity in 246 Eyes of the Homburg Keratoconus Center.《霍姆堡圆锥角膜中心 246 只眼中与圆锥角膜严重程度相关的眼压测量各种方法分析》
Cornea. 2023 Jul 1;42(7):829-836. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003170. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
3
Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations.
动态轮廓眼压计与 Goldmann 压平眼压计校正方程的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 23;12(1):20190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24318-y.
4
Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers.站立、坐立和仰卧位眼压测量:托诺笔Avia眼压计与Icare Pro眼压计的比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 22;11(21):6234. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216234.
5
Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.三种眼压计在近视准分子原位角膜磨镶术和准分子激光角膜切削术后眼内压测量中的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 May 27;16:1623-1637. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S362344. eCollection 2022.
6
Does body position, age, and heart rate induce IOP's changes?体位、年龄和心率会引起眼压变化吗?
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;32(3):1530-1537. doi: 10.1177/11206721211023313. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
7
Comparison between two devices in the detection of corneal thickness changes after cataract surgery.两种设备在白内障手术后检测角膜厚度变化中的比较。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 23;11(1):6709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86158-6.
8
Corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes: Comparison between two different Scheimpflug devices.健康眼的角膜厚度评估:两种不同的 Scheimpflug 设备的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243370. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.三种眼压测量方法的比较:iCare pro 回弹眼压计、非接触眼压计和 Goldmann 压平眼压计在不同眼压组中的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1236-5.
10
Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer.使用回弹式眼压计测量站立位眼压
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Oct 18;55(10):701. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100701.