David Emanuele, Grazhdani Hektor, Aliotta Lorenzo, Gavazzi Livio Maria, Foti Pietro Valerio, Palmucci Stefano, Inì Corrado, Tiralongo Francesco, Castiglione Davide, Renda Maurizio, Pacini Patrizia, Di Bella Chiara, Solito Carmen, Gigli Silvia, Fazio Alessandro, Bella Rita, Basile Antonio, Cantisani Vito
Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", University Hospital Policlinic "G. Rodolico-San Marco", 95125 Catania, Italy.
Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;14(16):1708. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161708.
Atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries is a crucial risk factor in predicting the likelihood of future stroke events. In addition, emerging studies suggest that carotid stenosis may also be an indicator of plaque load on coronary arteries and thus have a correlation with the risk of acute cardiovascular events. Furthermore, although in symptomatic patients the degree of stenosis is the main morphological parameter studied, recent evidence suggests, especially in asymptomatic patients, that plaque vulnerability should also be evaluated as an emerging and significant imaging parameter. The reference diagnostic methods for the evaluation of carotid stenosis are currently ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography angiography (CTA). In addition, other more invasive methods such as 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy and PET-CT, as well as digital subtraction angiography, can be used. Each method has advantages and disadvantages, and there is often some confusion in their use. For example, the usefulness of MRI is often underestimated. In addition, implementations for each method have been developed over the years and are already enabling a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of our study is to make an in-depth analysis of all the methods in use and in particular their role in the diagnostic procedure of carotid stenosis, also discussing new technologies.
颈动脉粥样硬化疾病是预测未来中风事件可能性的关键风险因素。此外,新出现的研究表明,颈动脉狭窄也可能是冠状动脉斑块负荷的一个指标,因此与急性心血管事件的风险相关。此外,虽然在有症状的患者中,狭窄程度是主要研究的形态学参数,但最近的证据表明,特别是在无症状患者中,斑块易损性也应作为一个新出现的重要成像参数进行评估。目前评估颈动脉狭窄的参考诊断方法是超声检查、磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层血管造影(CTA)。此外,还可以使用其他侵入性更强的方法,如123I-间碘苄胍(MIBG)闪烁显像和PET-CT,以及数字减影血管造影。每种方法都有优缺点,在使用中常常存在一些混淆。例如,MRI的有用性常常被低估。此外,多年来已经开发了每种方法的实施方案,并且已经能够显著提高诊断准确性。我们研究的目的是对所有正在使用的方法进行深入分析,特别是它们在颈动脉狭窄诊断程序中的作用,同时也讨论新技术。