Rotaru Vlad, Chitoran Elena, Zob Daniela-Luminita, Ionescu Sinziana-Octavia, Aisa Gelal, Andra-Delia Prie, Serban Dragos, Stefan Daniela-Cristina, Simion Laurentiu
Medicine School, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department I, Bucharest Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu", 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;14(16):1707. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161707.
First described some 80 years ago, pelvic exenteration remain controversial interventions with variable results and ever-changing indications. The previous studies are not homogenous and have different inclusion criteria (different populations and different disease characteristics) and methodologies (including evaluation of results), making it extremely difficult to properly assess the role of pelvic exenteration in cancer treatment. This study aims to describe the indications of pelvic exenterations, the main prognostic factors of oncologic results, and the possible complications of the intervention. For this purpose, we conducted a retrospective study of 132 patients who underwent various forms of pelvic exenterations in the Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu" in Bucharest, Romania, between 2013 and 2022, collecting sociodemographic data, characteristics of patients, information on the disease treated, data about the surgical procedure, complications, additional cancer treatments, and oncologic results. The study cohort consists of gynecological, colorectal, and urinary bladder malignancies (one hundred twenty-seven patients) and five patients with complex fistulas between pelvic organs. An R0 resection was possible in 76.38% of cases, while on the rest, positive margins on resection specimens were observed. The early morbidity was 40.63% and the mortality was 2.72%. Long-term outcomes included an overall survival of 43.7 months and a median recurrence-free survival of 24.3 months. The most important determinants of OS are completeness of resection, the colorectal origin of tumor, and the presence/absence of lymphovascular invasion. Although still associated with high morbidity rates, pelvic exenterations can deliver important improvements in oncological outcomes in the long-term and should be considered on a case-by-case basis. A good selection of patients and an experienced surgical team can facilitate optimal risks/benefits.
大约80年前首次被描述,盆腔脏器清除术仍是具有争议的干预措施,结果各异且适应证不断变化。先前的研究并不统一,有不同的纳入标准(不同人群和不同疾病特征)和方法(包括结果评估),这使得正确评估盆腔脏器清除术在癌症治疗中的作用极为困难。本研究旨在描述盆腔脏器清除术的适应证、肿瘤学结果的主要预后因素以及该干预措施可能的并发症。为此,我们对2013年至2022年期间在罗马尼亚布加勒斯特“阿尔. 特雷肖雷亚努教授”肿瘤研究所接受各种形式盆腔脏器清除术的132例患者进行了回顾性研究,收集了社会人口学数据、患者特征、所治疗疾病的信息、手术过程数据、并发症、额外的癌症治疗以及肿瘤学结果。研究队列包括妇科、结直肠和膀胱恶性肿瘤患者(127例)以及5例盆腔器官之间复杂瘘管的患者。76.38%的病例实现了R0切除,而其余病例切除标本的切缘呈阳性。早期发病率为40.63%,死亡率为2.72%。长期结果包括总生存期为43.7个月,无复发生存期的中位数为24.3个月。总生存期最重要的决定因素是切除的完整性、肿瘤的结直肠起源以及是否存在淋巴管浸润。尽管仍与高发病率相关,但盆腔脏器清除术从长期来看可显著改善肿瘤学结果,应根据具体情况予以考虑。精心挑选患者和经验丰富的手术团队有助于实现最佳的风险/获益比。