Suppr超能文献

由即用偏高岭土-生石灰粉末制备的地质聚合物浆体与传统地质聚合物的结构、微观结构及力学性能的对比研究

Comparative Study of the Structural, Microstructural, and Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Pastes Obtained from Ready-to-Use Metakaolin-Quicklime Powders and Classic Geopolymers.

作者信息

Zerzouri Maroua, Hamzaoui Rabah, Ziyani Layella, Alehyen Saliha

机构信息

Ecole Spéciale des Travaux Publics, Institut de Recherche en Constructibilité, Université Paris-Est, 28 avenue du Président Wilson, 94234 Cachan, France.

Ecole Normale Supérieure de Rabat, Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie des Matériaux Inorganiques et Organiques, Centre des Sciences des Matériaux, Université Mohammed V, Avenue Mohamed Bel Hassan El Ouazzani, Takaddoum-Rabat BP 5118, Morocco.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;17(16):4151. doi: 10.3390/ma17164151.

Abstract

This study compares the structural, microstructural, thermal, and mechanical properties of geopolymer pastes (GPs) created through traditional methods and those derived from ready-to-use powders for geopolymer (RUPG) materials. The metakaolin (MK) precursor was activated using a sodium silicate solution or CaO and MOH (where M is Na or K). Various ratios of precursor/activator and NaSiO or CaO/MOH were tested to determine the optimal combination. For RUPG, the MK precursor was activated by replacing the sodium silicate solution with quicklime. Metakaolin, alkaline hydroxide, and quicklime powders were mixed at different CaO ratios (wt%) and subjected to extensive ball milling to produce RUPG. The RUPG was then hydrated, molded, and cured at 20 °C and 50% relative humidity until testing. Analytical methods were used to characterize the raw and synthesized materials. Classic geopolymers (CGPs) activated with quicklime burst after one hour of molding. The results indicated slight amorphization of GP compared to raw MK, as confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis, showing N(K)-A-S-H in CGP and N(K)-A-S-H with calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H/C-A-S-H) in RUPG. The compressive strength of MK-based geopolymers reached 31.45 MPa and 34.92 MPa for GP and CGP, respectively, after 28 days of curing.

摘要

本研究比较了通过传统方法制备的地质聚合物浆料(GPs)与由地聚合物即用型粉末(RUPG)材料衍生的浆料的结构、微观结构、热性能和力学性能。偏高岭土(MK)前驱体使用硅酸钠溶液或CaO和MOH(其中M为Na或K)进行活化。测试了前驱体/活化剂以及NaSiO或CaO/MOH的各种比例,以确定最佳组合。对于RUPG,通过用生石灰替代硅酸钠溶液来活化MK前驱体。将偏高岭土、碱性氢氧化物和生石灰粉末按不同的CaO比例(wt%)混合,并进行大量球磨以制备RUPG。然后将RUPG进行水化、成型,并在20°C和50%相对湿度下养护直至测试。使用分析方法对原材料和合成材料进行表征。用生石灰活化的经典地质聚合物(CGPs)在成型一小时后爆裂。结果表明,与原始MK相比,GP略有非晶化,X射线衍射分析证实了这一点,显示CGP中为N(K)-A-S-H,RUPG中为N(K)-A-S-H与硅酸钙水合物(C-S-H/C-A-S-H)。养护28天后,基于MK的地质聚合物的抗压强度对于GP和CGP分别达到31.45 MPa和34.92 MPa。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05fc/11356287/75b646e67433/materials-17-04151-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验