• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非引流性创伤后急性硬膜外血肿消退与进展的预测因素

Predictive Factors for Regression versus Progression of Nonevacuated Posttraumatic Acute Extradural Hematoma.

作者信息

Elkholy Hany, Elnoamany Hossam, Hussein Mohamed Adel

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.

出版信息

Asian J Neurosurg. 2024 Jun 24;19(3):452-461. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775731. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1775731
PMID:39205887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349389/
Abstract

This study was a retrospective study conducted from October 2020 to October 2022 on 106 posttraumatic patients with acute extradural hematomas (EDHs) who were initially planned for conservative treatment. 74 patients had spontaneous EDH regression (EDHR), while 32 patients developed EDH progression (EDHP) and were shifted for surgery. The two groups were statistically compared regarding the different demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors to identify the significant predictors for regression versus progression of acute posttraumatic EDH.  Conventionally, urgent evacuation is the accepted management for EDH. However, several recent reports have described successful conservative management in selected patients. There are no adequate clues to verify patients who will have spontaneous EDHR from those at risk for EDHP and delayed surgery. The main objective of this study was to identify the significant predictors for possible regression versus progression of acute posttraumatic EDH initially planned for nonsurgical treatment.  A retrospective study conducted over 2 years, included 106 head trauma patients with acute EDH, who were admitted to our department and were initially planned for conservative treatment. Various demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors were analyzed to verify the significant predictors for spontaneous EDHR (EDHR group) versus EDHP and subsequent surgical evacuation (EDHP group).  The mean age was 20.37 ± 12.712 years and the mean Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) was 12.83 ± 2.113. Total 69.8% of patients showed spontaneous EDHR, while 30.2% developed EDHP and were shifted for surgical evacuation. Statistical comparison showed that higher GCS (  = 0.002), frontal location (  = 0.022), and concomitant fissure fracture (  =  0.014) were the significant predictors for EDHR, while younger age (  = 0.006), persistent nausea/vomiting (  = 0.046), early computed tomography (CT) after trauma (  = 0.021), temporal location (  < 0.001), and coagulopathy (  = 0.001) were significantly associated with EDHP.  Patients with traumatic EDH fitting the criteria of initial nonsurgical treatment necessitates 48 hours of close observation and serial CT scans at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours to confirm the regression or early detect the EDHP. Patients with high GCS, frontal hematomas, and associated fissure fracture are at low risk for EDHP. Increased alertness is mandatory for young age and patients with persistent nausea/vomiting, early CT scan, temporal hematomas, or coagulopathy.

摘要

本研究是一项回顾性研究,于2020年10月至2022年10月对106例创伤后急性硬膜外血肿(EDH)患者进行,这些患者最初计划接受保守治疗。74例患者出现硬膜外血肿自发消退(EDHR),而32例患者出现硬膜外血肿进展(EDHP)并转而接受手术治疗。对两组患者的不同人口统计学、临床和影像学因素进行统计学比较,以确定急性创伤后硬膜外血肿消退与进展的重要预测因素。

传统上,紧急清除血肿是硬膜外血肿公认的治疗方法。然而,最近的几份报告描述了在部分患者中成功进行保守治疗的情况。目前尚无足够线索来鉴别哪些患者会出现硬膜外血肿自发消退,哪些患者有硬膜外血肿进展及延迟手术的风险。本研究的主要目的是确定最初计划接受非手术治疗的急性创伤后硬膜外血肿可能消退与进展的重要预测因素。

一项为期2年的回顾性研究纳入了106例急性硬膜外血肿的头部创伤患者,这些患者入住我科,最初计划接受保守治疗。分析了各种人口统计学、临床和影像学因素,以验证硬膜外血肿自发消退组(EDHR组)与硬膜外血肿进展及随后手术清除组(EDHP组)的重要预测因素。

患者的平均年龄为20.37±12.712岁,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)平均评分为12.83±2.113。共有69.8%的患者出现硬膜外血肿自发消退,而30.2%的患者出现硬膜外血肿进展并转而接受手术清除。统计学比较显示,较高的GCS评分(P = 0.002)、额叶血肿(P = 0.022)和伴有颅骨骨折(P = 0.014)是硬膜外血肿自发消退的重要预测因素,而年龄较小(P = 0.006)、持续性恶心/呕吐(P = 0.046)、创伤后早期计算机断层扫描(CT)(P = 0.021)、颞叶血肿(P < 0.001)和凝血功能障碍(P = 0.001)与硬膜外血肿进展显著相关。

符合初始非手术治疗标准的创伤性硬膜外血肿患者需要密切观察48小时,并在6、12、24和48小时进行系列CT扫描,以确认血肿消退或早期发现硬膜外血肿进展。GCS评分高、额叶血肿和伴有颅骨骨折的患者发生硬膜外血肿进展的风险较低。对于年龄较小以及有持续性恶心/呕吐、早期CT扫描、颞叶血肿或凝血功能障碍的患者,必须提高警惕。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/117dd7a3c043/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/df2a7660ba95/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/3a08f08ef50d/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/e738a0327660/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/4cfd0922ffed/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/117dd7a3c043/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/df2a7660ba95/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/3a08f08ef50d/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/e738a0327660/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/4cfd0922ffed/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af0d/11349389/117dd7a3c043/10-1055-s-0043-1775731-i2370008-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive Factors for Regression versus Progression of Nonevacuated Posttraumatic Acute Extradural Hematoma.非引流性创伤后急性硬膜外血肿消退与进展的预测因素
Asian J Neurosurg. 2024 Jun 24;19(3):452-461. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775731. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Epidural Hematoma Treated Conservatively: When to Expect the Worst.保守治疗的硬膜外血肿:何时可能出现最坏情况
Can J Neurol Sci. 2016 Jan;43(1):74-81. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2015.232.
3
Outcome of traumatic extradural haematoma in Hong Kong.香港创伤性硬膜外血肿的治疗结果。
Injury. 2007 Jan;38(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.059. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
4
[Treatment options in traumatic epidural hematomas].[创伤性硬膜外血肿的治疗选择]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Mar;105(3):224-30. doi: 10.1007/s001130100316.
5
Predictive Factors for Delayed Surgical Intervention in Children With Epidural Hematomas.硬膜外血肿患儿延迟手术干预的预测因素。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Jun 1;39(6):402-407. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002825. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Contralateral acute epidural hematoma after decompressive surgery of acute subdural hematoma: clinical features and outcome.急性硬膜下血肿减压术后对侧急性硬膜外血肿:临床特征与转归
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1298-302. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815885d9.
7
Risk factors of delayed surgical evacuation for initially nonoperative acute subdural hematomas following mild head injury.轻度颅脑损伤后最初采取非手术治疗的急性硬膜下血肿延迟手术清除的危险因素。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Aug;156(8):1605-13. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2151-4. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
8
Management of Epidural Hematomas in Pediatric and Adult Population: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Study.儿童和成人硬膜外血肿的管理:一项基于医院的回顾性研究。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Sep;177:e686-e692. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.123. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
9
Role of repeat CT in mild to moderate head injury: an institutional study.重复 CT 在轻度至中度头部损伤中的作用:一项机构研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19527.
10
Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Low Glasgow Coma Score Patients With Extradural Hematoma: A Review of Literature and Guidelines.去骨瓣减压术治疗低格拉斯哥昏迷评分硬膜外血肿患者:文献综述与指南
Cureus. 2023 Jan 15;15(1):e33790. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33790. eCollection 2023 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Impact of Pre-surgical Delay on Extradural Hematoma Outcomes.评估术前延迟对硬膜外血肿预后的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 18;17(2):e79250. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79250. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Conservative management of extradural hematoma: A report of sixty-two cases.硬膜外血肿的保守治疗:62例报告。
Neurol Clin Neurosci. 2018 Jun;2(2):5-9. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
Swirl sign in traumatic acute epidural hematoma: prognostic value and surgical management.外伤性急性硬膜外血肿中的漩涡征:预后价值和手术处理。
Neurol Sci. 2017 Dec;38(12):2111-2116. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3121-4. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
3
Epidural Hematoma Treated Conservatively: When to Expect the Worst.保守治疗的硬膜外血肿:何时可能出现最坏情况
Can J Neurol Sci. 2016 Jan;43(1):74-81. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2015.232.
4
Extradural haematoma--to evacuate or not? Revisiting treatment guidelines.硬膜外血肿——是否进行引流?重新审视治疗指南。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;115(8):1201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
5
Traumatic extradural hematoma - role of non-surgical management and reasons for conversion.创伤性硬膜外血肿——非手术治疗的作用及转为手术治疗的原因
Indian J Surg. 2010 Apr;72(2):124-9. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0036-1. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
6
The impact of coagulopathy on the outcome of traumatic epidural hematoma.凝血功能障碍对创伤性硬脑膜外血肿结局的影响。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Oct;132(10):1445-50. doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1559-7. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
7
A prospective clinical study of routine repeat computed tomography (CT) after traumatic brain injury (TBI).创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后常规重复计算机断层扫描(CT)的前瞻性临床研究。
Brain Inj. 2012;26(10):1211-6. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.667591. Epub 2012 May 9.
8
Conservative management of acute epidural hematoma in a pediatric age group.小儿急性硬膜外血肿的保守治疗
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2009;45(3):181-4. doi: 10.1159/000218200. Epub 2009 May 14.
9
Nonoperative management of epidural hematomas and subdural hematomas: is it safe in lesions measuring one centimeter or less?硬膜外血肿和硬膜下血肿的非手术治疗:对于直径1厘米或更小的病灶是否安全?
J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):370-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318124a95b.
10
Nonoperative management of acute epidural hematomas: a "no-brainer".急性硬膜外血肿的非手术治疗:显而易见的选择。
Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):801-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.047.