Park Haeseong, Klempner Samuel J, Chao Joseph, Wainberg Zev A, Lukanowski Mariusz, Chenji Suresh, Bourke Shannon, Chatterjee Anindya, Lorenzen Sylvie
Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 13;14:1419338. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1419338. eCollection 2024.
The aim of this study was to provide a review of the clinical evidence for use of ramucirumab (RAM) plus folinic acid (leucovorin), fluorouracil (5-FU), and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or irinotecan as second-line treatment in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA).
A systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed was performed to identify phase 2 clinical trials or retrospective studies using RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan in GEA, including abstracts from major congresses, in addition to published manuscripts. An aggregated review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness (overall response rate [ORR] as primary outcome) and safety data of RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan. ORR for each study was calculated with 95% confidence interval estimated from normal approximation. To generate the combined ORR with 95% confidence interval, random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize response data from available studies.
Six studies were identified with non-overlapping populations, 3 phase 2 clinical trials and 3 retrospective studies. Across these studies the ORR ranged from 22% to 38%, and pooled ORR was 25.4%. Two of the 3 studies reported better ORR in patients pretreated with taxanes followed by RAM plus FOLFIRI. Treatment with RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan was well tolerated. Neutropenia and diarrhea were the most common adverse events reported across studies.
The studies examined in this review suggest that RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan have activity in previously treated GEA irrespective of prior-taxane use. Overall, RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan was well tolerated with no new safety concerns identified beyond established profiles for these regimens.
本研究旨在综述雷莫西尤单抗(RAM)联合亚叶酸钙(甲酰四氢叶酸)、氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)或伊立替康作为胃食管腺癌(GEA)二线治疗的临床证据。
对PubMed进行系统全面的检索,以确定在GEA中使用RAM联合FOLFIRI或伊立替康的2期临床试验或回顾性研究,包括主要大会的摘要以及已发表的手稿。进行汇总综述和荟萃分析,以评估RAM联合FOLFIRI或伊立替康的有效性(以总缓解率[ORR]作为主要结局)和安全性数据。每项研究的ORR通过正态近似估计的95%置信区间进行计算。为了生成具有95%置信区间的合并ORR,进行随机效应荟萃分析以综合现有研究的缓解数据。
确定了6项研究,研究人群不重叠,包括3项2期临床试验和3项回顾性研究。在这些研究中,ORR范围为22%至38%,汇总ORR为25.4%。3项研究中的2项报告称,接受紫杉烷预处理后再接受RAM联合FOLFIRI治疗的患者ORR更高。RAM联合FOLFIRI或伊立替康治疗耐受性良好。中性粒细胞减少和腹泻是各研究中报告的最常见不良事件。
本综述中审查的研究表明,无论先前是否使用过紫杉烷,RAM联合FOLFIRI或伊立替康在先前接受过治疗的GEA中均有活性。总体而言,RAM联合FOLFIRI或伊立替康耐受性良好,除了这些方案既定的安全性特征外,未发现新的安全问题。