Lorenzen Sylvie, Thuss-Patience Peter, Pauligk Claudia, Gökkurt Eray, Ettrich Thomas, Lordick Florian, Stahl Michael, Reichardt Peter, Sökler Martin, Pink Daniel, Probst Stefan, Hinke Axel, Goetze Thorsten O, Al-Batran Salah E
Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, München, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin/Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Med. Klinik M. S. Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie (CC14), Berlin, Germany.
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Apr;165:48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.015. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
Ramucirumab and paclitaxel is the standard second-line therapy in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the efficacy and safety analyses of FOLFIRI and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab after the failure of a platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy.
This multicenter, investigator initiated, phase II trial randomised patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to either FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM) (arm A) or paclitaxel plus RAM (arm B). The primary end-point was 6-month overall survival (OS) rate, with a proportion of ≥65% in arm A considered a positive signal for further investigation.
111 patients (65% of patients had prior docetaxel) were enrolled and 110 patients qualified for ITT population (arm A, 72; arm B, 38). The study did not meet the primary end-point for the comparison with historical control, as 6-month OS rate in the FOLFIRI plus RAM arm was 54% (95% CI 44-67). In between arm comparison, OS was similar (hazard ratio, HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.62-1.52]), while objective response rates (ORRs) and PFS were numerically better in arm A versus arm B (HR for PFS 0.73; ORR, 22% versus 11%). These differences were largely attributed to favourable efficacy results for arm A in docetaxel-pretreated patients (HR, 0.49; ORR, 25% versus 8%). In the safety population (n = 106), grade 3-5 adverse events were similar between arms (arm A, 75%; arm B, 68%).
The RAMIRIS trial demonstrated feasibility of FOLFIRI plus RAM. While the study was formally negative, it provided a signal to further investigate this combination for the group of patients with previous docetaxel therapy.
clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03081143.
雷莫西尤单抗和紫杉醇是转移性胃食管腺癌患者的标准二线治疗方案。我们报告了在含铂和氟嘧啶化疗失败后,FOLFIRI方案联合雷莫西尤单抗与紫杉醇联合雷莫西尤单抗的疗效和安全性分析。
这项多中心、研究者发起的II期试验将胃食管腺癌患者随机分为FOLFIRI联合雷莫西尤单抗(RAM)组(A组)或紫杉醇联合RAM组(B组)。主要终点是6个月总生存率(OS),A组≥65%的比例被视为进一步研究的阳性信号。
共纳入111例患者(65%的患者曾接受多西他赛治疗),110例患者符合意向性分析人群标准(A组72例;B组38例)。该研究未达到与历史对照比较的主要终点,因为FOLFIRI联合RAM组的6个月OS率为54%(95%CI 44-67)。组间比较时,OS相似(风险比,HR 0.97 [95%CI 0.62-1.52]),而A组的客观缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS)在数值上优于B组(PFS的HR为0.73;ORR,22%对11%)。这些差异主要归因于A组在多西他赛预处理患者中的良好疗效结果(HR,0.49;ORR,25%对8%)。在安全性分析人群(n = 106)中,3-5级不良事件在两组间相似(A组75%;B组68%)。
RAMIRIS试验证明了FOLFIRI联合RAM的可行性。虽然该研究在形式上为阴性,但为进一步研究该联合方案用于既往接受多西他赛治疗的患者群体提供了一个信号。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT03081143。