• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症性肠病治疗的患者偏好:使用离散选择实验进行全球偏好调查的方案制定

Patient preferences for inflammatory bowel disease treatments: protocol development of a global preference survey using a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Schoefs Elise, Vermeire Séverine, Ferrante Marc, Sabino João, Verstockt Bram, Avedano Luisa, De Rocchis Maria Stella, Sajak-Szczerba Magdalena, Saldaña Roberto, Straetemans Noortje, Vandebroek Martina, Janssens Rosanne, Huys Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 14;11:1418874. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1418874. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1418874
PMID:39206174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349669/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to expand, a need exists to understand how patients perceive and value different attributes associated with their disease as well as with current and emerging treatments. These insights can inform the development and regulation of effective interventions for IBD, benefiting various stakeholders including healthcare professionals, drug developers, regulators, Health Technology Assessment bodies, payers, and ultimately patients suffering from IBD. In response to this, the present patient preference study was developed with the aim to (1) determine the relative preference weights for IBD treatment and disease related attributes, and (2) explain how preferences may differ across patients with different characteristics (preference heterogeneity).

METHODS

The patient preference study (PPS) was developed through an 8-step process, with each step being informed by an advisory board. This process included: (1) stated preference method selection, (2) attribute and level development (including a scoping literature review, focus group discussions, and advisory board meetings), (3) choice task construction, (4) sample size estimation, (5) survey implementation, (6) piloting, (7) translation, and (8) pre-testing. The resulting discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey comprises 14 attributes with between two and five varying levels. Participants will answer 15 DCE questions with a partial profile design, where each of the choice questions encompasses two hypothetical treatment profiles showing four attributes. Additionally, questions about patients' socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as contextual factors are implemented. The survey is available in 15 different languages and aims to minimally recruit 700 patients globally.

DISCUSSION

This protocol gives valuable insights toward preference researchers and decision-makers on how PPS design can be transparently reported, demonstrating solutions to remaining gaps in preference research. Results of the PPS will provide evidence regarding the disease and treatment related characteristics that are most important for IBD patients, and how these may differ across patients with different characteristics. These findings will yield valuable insights applicable to preference research, drug development, regulatory approval, and reimbursement processes, enabling decision making across the medicinal product life cycle that is aligned with the true needs of IBD patients.

摘要

背景

随着炎症性肠病(IBD)治疗领域的不断拓展,有必要了解患者如何看待和重视与其疾病以及当前和新兴治疗方法相关的不同属性。这些见解可为IBD有效干预措施的开发和监管提供参考,使包括医疗保健专业人员、药物研发人员、监管机构、卫生技术评估机构、支付方以及最终IBD患者在内的各方利益相关者受益。为此,开展了本次患者偏好研究,旨在(1)确定IBD治疗及疾病相关属性的相对偏好权重,以及(2)解释不同特征患者的偏好可能存在的差异(偏好异质性)。

方法

患者偏好研究(PPS)通过一个8步骤流程制定,每一步骤都有咨询委员会提供指导。该流程包括:(1)选择陈述偏好方法,(2)属性和水平开发(包括范围界定文献综述、焦点小组讨论和咨询委员会会议),(3)选择任务构建,(4)样本量估计,(5)调查实施,(6)预试验,(7)翻译,以及(8)预测试。最终的离散选择实验(DCE)调查包括14个属性,每个属性有两到五个不同水平。参与者将回答15个采用部分轮廓设计的DCE问题,每个选择问题包含两个展示四个属性的假设治疗方案。此外,还设置了关于患者社会人口统计学和临床特征以及背景因素的问题。该调查有15种不同语言版本,目标是在全球范围内至少招募700名患者。

讨论

本方案为偏好研究人员和决策者提供了关于如何透明报告PPS设计的宝贵见解,展示了偏好研究中尚存差距的解决方案。PPS的结果将提供证据,说明对IBD患者最重要的疾病和治疗相关特征,以及这些特征在不同特征患者之间可能存在的差异。这些发现将产生适用于偏好研究、药物开发、监管批准和报销流程的宝贵见解,使整个医药产品生命周期的决策与IBD患者的真正需求保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6900/11349669/c0fbb5cbffc3/fmed-11-1418874-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6900/11349669/c0fbb5cbffc3/fmed-11-1418874-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6900/11349669/c0fbb5cbffc3/fmed-11-1418874-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient preferences for inflammatory bowel disease treatments: protocol development of a global preference survey using a discrete choice experiment.炎症性肠病治疗的患者偏好:使用离散选择实验进行全球偏好调查的方案制定
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 14;11:1418874. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1418874. eCollection 2024.
2
Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatments: A Study Protocol for a Preference Survey Using Discrete Choice Experiment and Swing Weighting.肺癌治疗的患者偏好:一项使用离散选择实验和摆动加权法进行偏好调查的研究方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 2;8:689114. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.689114. eCollection 2021.
3
Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study Protocol Among Advanced Lung Cancer Patients.患者对肺癌治疗的偏好:一项晚期肺癌患者的定性研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 5;9:622154. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.622154. eCollection 2021.
4
What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study.多发性骨髓瘤患者最看重的是什么?一项泛欧洲患者偏好研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 29;12:1027353. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1027353. eCollection 2022.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Analysis of physicians' perspectives versus patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma.分析医生观点与患者偏好:多发性骨髓瘤治疗中的直接评估和离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Jun;12(3):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0218-6. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
7
Patient Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From a Large Survey Across Seven European Countries Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.炎症性肠病患者对治疗属性的偏好:一项在七个欧洲国家进行的使用离散选择实验的大型调查结果
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Dec 5;30(12):2380-2394. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae015.
8
Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.
9
Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.女性对孕早期流产管理属性的偏好:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):551-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00459.x. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
10
DCE attribute development investigating public policy for the provision of medicinal cannabis.探索药用大麻供应的公共政策的 DCE 属性开发。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1232-1244. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2405288. Epub 2024 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Priorities to Increase Confidence in and Acceptance of Health Preference Research: What Questions Should be Prioritized Now?优先研究事项以增强健康偏好研究的信心和接受度:现在应优先考虑哪些问题?
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):179-190. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00650-x. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
2
Inflammatory bowel diseases patients suffer from significant low levels and barriers to physical activity: The "BE-FIT-IBD" study.炎症性肠病患者的身体活动水平显著较低,且面临着诸多障碍:“BE-FIT-IBD”研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 7;29(41):5668-5682. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i41.5668.
3
Patient preferences in treatment options of ulcerative colitis: a discrete choice experiment.
溃疡性结肠炎治疗选择中的患者偏好:离散选择实验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar;59(3):288-295. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2286191. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
4
How can patient preferences be used and communicated in the regulatory evaluation of medicinal products? Findings and recommendations from IMI PREFER and call to action.在药品监管评估中,如何运用并传达患者偏好?来自IMI PREFER的研究结果与建议及行动呼吁
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1192770. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1192770. eCollection 2023.
5
Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病。
Prim Care. 2023 Sep;50(3):411-427. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments.抄近道:离散选择实验中的简化启发式方法。
Patient. 2023 Jul;16(4):301-315. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Exploring the Pipeline of Novel Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease; State of the Art Review.探索炎症性肠病新型疗法的研发进程;最新技术综述
Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 1;11(3):747. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030747.
8
Current perspectives on pediatric inflammatory bowel disease focusing on transitional care management. What should we consider?儿科炎症性肠病的当前观点:重点关注过渡性护理管理。我们应该考虑哪些问题?
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;46(2):139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Holistic healthcare in inflammatory bowel disease: time for patient-centric approaches?炎症性肠病的整体医疗保健:是时候采用以患者为中心的方法了吗?
Gut. 2023 Jan;72(1):192-204. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328221. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
10
What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study.炎症性肠病患者的未满足需求和最相关的治疗结局有哪些?一项定性的患者偏好研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Apr 3;17(3):379-388. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac145.